Child Rapist Sues for getting raped in jail

[Moose-Knuckle]

I also agree we can not throw them to the wolves (though its what my heart would want), I also while want these people dead, execution is not fair (even if that is to say they get off too lightly by simply being killed).

Fair?! What is fair is for them to be raped themselves as punishment for what they did to someone else. Then they need to be purged from society as they are a threat the whole of their lives.

Solution, isolation for the rest of their lives, for their own safety and all.

That sounds great and all but why should I have to pay for their isolation; housing, medical, clothing, food, education, cable TV, rec yard, etc? I'm sick of footing the bill, execute them already.

[TMS951]

Fair?! What is fair is for them to be raped themselves as punishment for what they did to someone else. Then they need to be purged from society as they are a threat the whole of their lives.

That sounds great and all but why should I have to pay for their isolation; housing, medical, clothing, food, education, cable TV, rec yard, etc? I'm sick of footing the bill, execute them already.

I agree on both your points, really I favor one of the above posters idea of turning them over to the father. But end of the day I believe in some of the fundamentals of our legal system. Part of that being not to truly torture criminals, and that they need to be decently protected in prison.

I don't want to pay for it either, but I'd much rather pay for them to rot in solitary than to be paying for all the drug offenders and non violent criminals in prison right now.

Holding sex offenders in isolation for the rest of their lives is pretty high on my list of shit I'd like to see done with my tax money.

I don't think executing them is 'fair' because they didn't kill some one, and I think they should suffer longer in the same way their victims do.

[11B101ABN]

"They failed to protect him".

Hmm.

If cops aren't legally bound to protect us, are prison guards legally bound to protect their prisoners?

1) You are misinterpreting the ruling.

2) Yes. In a detention setting, the Sheriff/Jailer is responsible for safeguarding the prisoners in his custody from predation and malicious attack.

[MorphCross]

Fair?! What is fair is for them to be raped themselves as punishment for what they did to someone else. Then they need to be purged from society as they are a threat the whole of their lives.

That sounds great and all but why should I have to pay for their isolation; housing, medical, clothing, food, education, cable TV, rec yard, etc? I'm sick of footing the bill, execute them already.

A complicated subject. Should they be removed from society. Yes. Should they be killed for rape. In some cases yes. Should they be subjected to Rape as a matter of punishment. No. Will I ever cry for a rapist getting sodomized in prison. NO.

As the presence of Sexual Offender Registries prove you technically can't ever trust a sexual offender for as long as they live so why risk them being allowed out of prison? Yet we are unwilling to keep them in prison because it cost too much? There is a disconnect here. Housing is a given if you don't want to kill them with exposure. Doesn't mean they need AC at temperatures around 70-74 degrees F. Or heating at temperatures of 68 degrees overnight. Medical. Treat infectious ailments so guards aren't put at risk. Broken bones should be set in the cheapest fashion possible. Give that person the proper amount of time to recover before putting them on a work detail. Things such as cancer, diabetes, or other maladies, their family should have to pay for out of pocket. The state should have no responsibility to pay for it. Clothing again is required, to keep them from dying from exposure. Food should be contained to a single serving per meal with the largest amount of calories, carbs, and proteins given in the morning and scaling down throughout the day so they go to minimum daily value for the average adult male/female depending. It puts everyone on equal footing as the largest of inmates won't be brutalizing the smallest easily. Network TV only on days the weather is too nasty to let them out into the rec yard. Their library should only be self help books and fiction contained to pre-teen reading level.

I don't really see how the above could be taken as cruel or unusual.

[Moose-Knuckle]

I agree on both your points, really I favor one of the above posters idea of turning them over to the father. But end of the day I believe in some of the fundamentals of our legal system. Part of that being not to truly torture criminals, and that they need to be decently protected in prison.

I don't want to pay for it either, but I'd much rather pay for them to rot in solitary than to be paying for all the drug offenders and non violent criminals in prison right now.

Holding sex offenders in isolation for the rest of their lives is pretty high on my list of shit I'd like to see done with my tax money.

I don't think executing them is 'fair' because they didn't kill some one, and I think they should suffer longer in the same way their victims do.

A complicated subject. Should they be removed from society. Yes. Should they be killed for rape. In some cases yes. Should they be subjected to Rape as a matter of punishment. No. Will I ever cry for a rapist getting sodomized in prison. NO.

As the presence of Sexual Offender Registries prove you technically can't ever trust a sexual offender for as long as they live so why risk them being allowed out of prison? Yet we are unwilling to keep them in prison because it cost too much? There is a disconnect here. Housing is a given if you don't want to kill them with exposure. Doesn't mean they need AC at temperatures around 70-74 degrees F. Or heating at temperatures of 68 degrees overnight. Medical. Treat infectious ailments so guards aren't put at risk. Broken bones should be set in the cheapest fashion possible. Give that person the proper amount of time to recover before putting them on a work detail. Things such as cancer, diabetes, or other maladies, their family should have to pay for out of pocket. The state should have no responsibility to pay for it. Clothing again is required, to keep them from dying from exposure. Food should be contained to a single serving per meal with the largest amount of calories, carbs, and proteins given in the morning and scaling down throughout the day so they go to minimum daily value for the average adult male/female depending. It puts everyone on equal footing as the largest of inmates won't be brutalizing the smallest easily. Network TV only on days the weather is too nasty to let them out into the rec yard. Their library should only be self help books and fiction contained to pre-teen reading level.

I don't really see how the above could be taken as cruel or unusual.

If we're not going to execute the 02 thieves then they need to be not only completely isolated from society but also completely independent from society. Every aspect of their life from their housing, clothing, medical care, and food must be provided by themselves through forced labor. No TV, no cigarettes, no weights, just pure back breaking labor day in and day out. They will be so busy from the labor that they won't have time to play butt cowboys in the shower.