Page 2 of 54 FirstFirst 12341252 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 537

Thread: NEW Leupold LCO optic

  1. #11
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    1,797
    Feedback Score
    7 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by WS6 View Post
    Eotech and Aimpoint already dominate that field. The etched angle would fill a niche for people who otherwise run mini ACOG's but would rather true 1X and battery power to prevent washout.
    Why 1x if it's not going to be parallax-free? Why not 1-4x or something like that?

    Even with astigmatism, does the Aimpoint really hinder your ability to out rounds on target? My T1 dot looks like a spider, but I've managed to make hits on 18" plates to 700+.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    6,762
    Feedback Score
    11 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by tylerw02 View Post
    Why 1x if it's not going to be parallax-free? Why not 1-4x or something like that?

    Even with astigmatism, does the Aimpoint really hinder your ability to out rounds on target? My T1 dot looks like a spider, but I've managed to make hits on 18" plates to 700+.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Leupold already has a 1x variable. Weight.
    No optic is parallax free.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    1,797
    Feedback Score
    7 (100%)
    Not fully parallax free but parallax free beyond a few feet---you know what I was saying. Very small market segment cares about a 1x etched reticle because there will be more parallax with a reticle vs a projection.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    6,762
    Feedback Score
    11 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by tylerw02 View Post
    Not fully parallax free but parallax free beyond a few feet---you know what I was saying. Very small market segment cares about a 1x etched reticle because there will be more parallax with a reticle vs a projection.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    My t1 has plenty at 100 yards. This is why I zero and shoot with my fsp up typically so I can maintain the same relationship with the dot as to avoid zero shift from parallax.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    1,797
    Feedback Score
    7 (100%)
    Funny, mine doesn't seem to at all. I run both eyes open an can pretty much nail targets


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    6,762
    Feedback Score
    11 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by tylerw02 View Post
    Funny, mine doesn't seem to at all. I run both eyes open an can pretty much nail targets


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Ymmv. Shooting groups exposed the issue. Running and gunning was no issue though. My adjustments and groups sucked until Kyle lamb had me try it his way though. I've stuck with it and it's done me a solid.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    1,797
    Feedback Score
    7 (100%)
    Mine shoots groups smaller than the dot. How big were your groups? Whole purpose of 1x is speed. If it were an etched reticle is we afraid of losing speed.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    6,762
    Feedback Score
    11 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by tylerw02 View Post
    Mine shoots groups smaller than the dot. How big were your groups? Whole purpose of 1x is speed. If it were an etched reticle is we afraid of losing speed.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    About 3" with m193 at 100. 3 clicks got a 6" shift and I knew something was wrong. Kyle to the rescue. It was impossible to zero easily until the fsp came up and the dot was consistently related to it.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    FL
    Posts
    9,328
    Feedback Score
    28 (100%)
    I'm with WS6 on this.
    There is a difference, depending on precision expectation.
    Jack Leuba
    Director of Sales
    Knight's Armament Company
    jleuba@knightarmco.com

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Vegas
    Posts
    6,717
    Feedback Score
    5 (100%)
    Over the last year I've found myself less and less interested in red dots.

    I used to own an EXPS3-0 and still own a PRO and T-1. T-1 is on my SBR and PRO on my .22 upper.

    But after using a Mk8 at <25yd matches... I don't see the point anymore... So I plan to replace all my optics with Mk8s. After I win the lottery.

    But seriously, I'd rather run a Vortex 1-4 or VX-R 1.25-4 or Mk6 or VCOG or obviously a Mk8 over any red dot.

    I hope this new optic has like 1.5x magnification to be honest. Leupold better be going with a DP2 type illumination rather than the Mk6/8 though.
    Last edited by Koshinn; 10-13-14 at 12:11.
    "I never learned from a man who agreed with me." Robert A. Heinlein

Page 2 of 54 FirstFirst 12341252 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •