I've been shooting more and more with the XPS2-2 and find it more and more intuitive and useful. I zeroed the center dot at 25M (1.2 inch low to emulate 50M zero--not ideal, but I haven't been out to a larger range yet). I believe the second dot is approximately 8 MOA lower (Please correct me if I am wrong), which would make it suitable for ranges from 300M to 500M, though at those ranges, I usually use magnified optics or irons; I rarely use an RDS at those ranges. I also don't feel comfortable putting a magnifier on an SBR--its like using a hammer as a screwdriver. That is why I was initially considering running the Aimpoint on the SBR and the Eotech with magnifier on my Daniel Defense DDM4V7. But the Eotech really shines on the SBR; it is so visually comfortable and unobtrusive
The Eotech is great for distance estimation, its use a BDC, the speed of target acquisition in close quarters and the 2-2, especially, for its versatility. Overall, though, I still trust the Aimpoint more. If I had to pick only one optic, especially for , it would be the Aimpoint.
Eotech on the 16 inch AR with magnifier and Aimpoint PRO on the SBR? Each setup has its own advantages; my indecision on this matter is paralyzing.
U.S. Army (RET)
NRA, GOA, SAF, IDPA, USPSA member
Bookmarks