Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 12

Thread: .223 gel test: Hornady 55 gr soft point hand load

  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    644
    Feedback Score
    0

    .223 gel test: Hornady 55 gr soft point hand load

    Link to video of test




    Hornady 55 gr SP over 25.4 gr TAC fired from 11.5" and 16" AR-15 pattern rifles into calibrated 10% gelatin. Surefire FA556AR silencer was attached to both rifles.

    BB: 590.5 fps, 3.7"

    16" barrel results

    Impact velocity: 3,014 fps
    Penetration: 10.7"
    Retained weight: 26.9 gr
    Max expansion: 0.425"
    Min expansion: 0.335"

    11.5" barrel results

    Impact velocity: 2,751 fps
    Penetration: 12.1"
    Retained weight: 31.3 gr
    Max expansion: 0.410"
    Min expansion: 0.350"


  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    FL -Where it's summer 10.5 months out of the year
    Posts
    4,114
    Feedback Score
    17 (100%)
    Excellent work, Andrew.
    "That thing looks about as enjoyable as a bowl of exploding dicks." - Magic_Salad0892

    "The body cannot go where the mind has not already been."

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    644
    Feedback Score
    0
    Thank you, sir.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    451
    Feedback Score
    0
    Outstanding!

    I've been running just 25 grains of TAC over Nosler 55gr SP's and getting very good accuracy... I will try bumping it up to 25.4 and see what I get.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    438
    Feedback Score
    0
    Any idea as to WHY the Penetration is Deeper with the Slower round?
    1.4" deeper while being 263 fps slower...?

    I see the faster round opened up .015" more, so this would slow it down faster but then again, it is also .015" smaller which wouldn't slow it down faster...?
    By the way, isn't this strange as all get out, it has changed exactly the same amount bigger and smaller!

    OH I see, the slower round held more of it's weight, that's why..... I guess LOL

    Thanks for sharing this Andrew, very cool indeed.

    Peace Jeff
    Last edited by RVTMaverick; 11-25-14 at 13:12.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    AZ
    Posts
    27,195
    Feedback Score
    14 (100%)
    Interesting. Slowing the bullet down helps is penetrate better it seems. I have an AR barrel that will spin half of those bullets apart for some reason.
    "You people have too much time on your hands." - scottryan

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    644
    Feedback Score
    0
    I'm no expert but I have two thoughts on it:

    The faster bullet might expand earlier.

    Some variation in penetration is normal. That's why single round tests like my own are not remotely definitive. Illuminating and entertaining, sure, but when it comes to selecting a load for defense, look at tests performed by professionals with a statistically relevant samples size.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    AZ
    Posts
    27,195
    Feedback Score
    14 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by AndrewWiggin View Post
    I'm no expert but I have two thoughts on it:

    The faster bullet might expand earlier.
    It's not uncommon at all. I remember reading a mil study on 7.62 bullets where they penetrated wood deeper when they slowed down the velocity (diminishing returns apply of course)

    With these bullets, I bet the higher velocity caused more aggressive expansion and the bullet dumps more energy faster. I bet those results are very repeatable.
    "You people have too much time on your hands." - scottryan

  9. #9
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    438
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by AndrewWiggin View Post
    I'm no expert but I have two thoughts on it:

    The faster bullet might expand earlier.

    Some variation in penetration is normal. That's why single round tests like my own are not remotely definitive. Illuminating and entertaining, sure, but when it comes to selecting a load for defense, look at tests performed by professionals with a statistically relevant samples size.
    Yes, but the MAIN thing as to Why,
    (I believe now) is because the slower bullet held together better, in turn retaining more of it's weight and helping it to penetrate deeper.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    N.E. OH
    Posts
    6,738
    Feedback Score
    0
    This is seen a bit with .40 rounds loaded up to 10mm. They overexpand and underpenetrate.

    Once again, awesome test.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •