|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
I still prefer the "old" broomstick VFG as the best and mos secure way to retain your weapon effectively in any kind of a CQB situation. The "stiff support arm" grip is effective when you have a need for such precision at longer ranges, but it makes the weapon very easy to wrest from your control given the manner in which the support hand it stiffly forward. I also like the ability to rest the broomhandle on door and window sills in house, or window sills in cars. MY favorite VFG is ... BCM, of course. The full length model that is angled slightly toward the operator.
But...if I was a huge fan of the "stiff arm support hand grip" I would be taking a very close look at these new grips from BCM.
I like how BCM kind of waits to see what everyone else has done, or is doing, and then does it one better. I feel that way about the Gunfighter Stock.
BCM has developed patent pending anchors which allow for the use of a single fastener while engaging multiple mounting slots. These beefy anchors are also what are taking all the force when mounted. They can be mounted reversibly as they're symmetric in nature (no disassembly required). Their shape is partially the result of achieving this symmetry.
The MOD 3 VFG is slightly narrower (~.20"), and slightly shorter (~.15") than even the keymod short VFG. The pic-rail and KeyMod versions of the MOD 3 are also identical other than attachment method.
would these be legal to put on a pistol build in ca?
so far to the left i must be right.
I have 3 of them inbound: 2 for the Picatinny rail and 1 for the KMR.
11C2P '83-'87
Airborne Infantry
Bookmarks