
Originally Posted by
Co-gnARR
Wasn't this the point of Springfield's EMP design? They market it as a 1911 engineered from the ground up to specifically accommodate the 9mm (or 40) vs swapping a 45acp 1911 barrel with a 9mm conversion barrel and magazines and calling it good. I've never fired the EMP nor do I know its reliability vs the 9mm versions mentioned above. I'm curious if Colt will follow suit, hence my previous question re: frame size. (I could have been more specific, I guess.)
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
My experience with EMPs (only 2 o them) is that they don't run reliably through a high round count course (whether that represents a useful measure relevant to carrying it is debateable). One went back for an overhaul by Springfield and still didn't run with anything like Glock/HK/MP like reliability, and one became a safe queen.
Wondering if there is a hi cap option coming.
Damien
If a large number of people are willing to kill you for saying something, then it probably really needs to be said. .
Bookmarks