Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 20

Thread: 7 62x39mm gel test: 123 gr Fusion

  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    644
    Feedback Score
    0

    7 62x39mm gel test: 123 gr Fusion

    Link to video of test








    Federal 123 gr Fusion soft point fired from 16" WASR-10/63 into calibrated 10% gelatin.

    BB: 588.5 fps, 3.6"

    Impact velocity: ~2,267 fps
    Penetration: 15.1"
    Retained weight: 117.4 gr
    Max expansion: 0.759"
    Min expansion: 0.460"
    Neck: 0.5"
    TSC: 2.5"x8"


    Big thanks to radiotom from 10mm-firearms.com for providing the ammo.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    georgia
    Posts
    218
    Feedback Score
    33 (100%)
    pretty good results.
    can you tell me if the neck and primer have sealant?
    i ask because in the pic it looks like there is some blue sealant on the primer.
    definitely going to add some to the reserves.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    644
    Feedback Score
    0
    Definitely on the primer. Couldn't tell you about the neck.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    2,920
    Feedback Score
    22 (100%)
    Excellent test, looks like a top performer for that caliber. Does this mean you finally stopped shooting odd ball rounds out of odd ball barrel lengths?

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    644
    Feedback Score
    0
    No. It means my buddy who has the PAP pistol wasn't with me. I'll continue to test .2235/5.56mm and 7.62x39mm from 16" and 10.5" or 11.5" when I can. I think that the short barrel tests are useful, not just as an idea of what the round can do from a short barrel, but it also provides a good way of predicting how the bullet will behave further down range when fired from a longer barrel.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    georgia
    Posts
    218
    Feedback Score
    33 (100%)
    the down range ballistics and terminal performance is what counts.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    800
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by AndrewWiggin View Post
    No. It means my buddy who has the PAP pistol wasn't with me. I'll continue to test .2235/5.56mm and 7.62x39mm from 16" and 10.5" or 11.5" when I can. I think that the short barrel tests are useful, not just as an idea of what the round can do from a short barrel, but it also provides a good way of predicting how the bullet will behave further down range when fired from a longer barrel.
    I appreciate the short barrel tests as it is very applicable to my short barreled AK....

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Where the 2nd Amendment still lives.
    Posts
    2,729
    Feedback Score
    5 (100%)
    Another well done test, Do you think the Tula 124gr H/P's (8M3 Bullet) will be happening any time soon?
    We are all inclined to judge ourselves by our ideals; others, by their acts.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    644
    Feedback Score
    0
    I tested it a few weeks ago but it yawed and left the block. It didn't look like there was much fragmentation. I also sectioned the bullet and although it has scoring on the inside of the jacket, it doesn't appear that it is 8M3.




  10. #10
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    25
    Feedback Score
    0
    Thanks for the test, you are the only guy on all of u tube or anywhere else for that matter to have tested this stuff. I plan on shooting hogs with it next month.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •