I'm picturing a swing wing handgun....
The Second Amendment ACKNOWLEDGES our right to own and bear arms that are in common use that can be used for lawful purposes. The arms can be restricted ONLY if subject to historical analogue from the founding era or is dangerous (unsafe) AND unusual.
It's that simple.
why isn't this in handgun discussion?
Umm...I'm confused. So, S&W is going to team-up with GD to design a new modular handgun that will be tested sometime in the next 12.5 months? Riiiiight.The Army’s draft MHS solicitation identifies design and performance requirements for a new modular handgun system that can be easily adjusted to fit all hand sizes and is optimized for improved gun, ammunition and magazine performance. The Army’s stated plan is to commence the competition in January 2015, with delivery of the first new handgun systems in 2017.
Maybe I'm wrong and the S&W fairy godmother can wave her wand a pull a new M&P spin-off pistol out of Chris Costa's ass, but didn't it take HK almost 4 years to design the VP9?
In addition, the letter mentions the M&P pistol, why does S&W need GD for a pistol that already exists?
Last edited by Sensei; 11-28-14 at 23:36.
I like my rifles like my women - short, light, fast, brown, and suppressed.
Or as was mentioned the piece GD brings to the table is expertise and lobbyists for government contracts.
I just checked the GD site... They are heavily into the arms industry beyond just aircraft systems.
http://www.gd-ots.com/productsbycategory.html
And holy crap! They make gatling guns in 50 cal? Not sure it's that practical but I'd love to give one a go!
http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=X1VMHQzwDwc
Before you suggest that licensing, background checks, or other restrictions for the 2nd Amendment are reasonable... Apply those same ideas to the 1st and 4th Amendments. Then tell me how reasonable they are.
Bookmarks