Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 17 of 17

Thread: Smith & Wesson/General Dynamics team up for Modular Handgun System

  1. #11
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    15,429
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Slater View Post
    With General Dynamics on board, S&W has a partner to shoulder some of the cost (presumably) of the competition. And someone with extensive experience with government contracts.
    That's a good team, I'm rather surprised that GD didn't jump on Colt when they were in trouble.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    786
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Averageman View Post
    That's a good team, I'm rather surprised that GD didn't jump on Colt when they were in trouble.
    Well, they are in trouble NOW...

  3. #13
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    17,434
    Feedback Score
    0
    I'm picturing a swing wing handgun....
    The Second Amendment ACKNOWLEDGES our right to own and bear arms that are in common use that can be used for lawful purposes. The arms can be restricted ONLY if subject to historical analogue from the founding era or is dangerous (unsafe) AND unusual.

    It's that simple.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    1,728
    Feedback Score
    7 (100%)
    why isn't this in handgun discussion?

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    6,162
    Feedback Score
    0
    The Army’s draft MHS solicitation identifies design and performance requirements for a new modular handgun system that can be easily adjusted to fit all hand sizes and is optimized for improved gun, ammunition and magazine performance. The Army’s stated plan is to commence the competition in January 2015, with delivery of the first new handgun systems in 2017.
    Umm...I'm confused. So, S&W is going to team-up with GD to design a new modular handgun that will be tested sometime in the next 12.5 months? Riiiiight.

    Maybe I'm wrong and the S&W fairy godmother can wave her wand a pull a new M&P spin-off pistol out of Chris Costa's ass, but didn't it take HK almost 4 years to design the VP9?

    In addition, the letter mentions the M&P pistol, why does S&W need GD for a pistol that already exists?
    Last edited by Sensei; 11-28-14 at 23:36.
    I like my rifles like my women - short, light, fast, brown, and suppressed.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Naples, FL
    Posts
    517
    Feedback Score
    6 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Sensei View Post
    Umm...I'm confused. So, S&W is going to team-up with GD to design a new modular handgun that will be tested sometime in the next 12.5 months? Riiiiight.

    Maybe I'm wrong and the S&W fairy godmother can wave her wand a pull a new M&P spin-off pistol out of Chris Costa's ass, but didn't it take HK almost 4 years to design the VP9?

    In addition, the letter mentions the M&P pistol, why does S&W need GD for a pistol that already exists?
    Well, if they are designing it based around the M&P, there is a lot of R&D work done right there. I am also willing to bet that GD and S&W have been working on this for a bit longer than the press release has indicated.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    1,920
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by BVickery View Post
    Well, if they are designing it based around the M&P, there is a lot of R&D work done right there. I am also willing to bet that GD and S&W have been working on this for a bit longer than the press release has indicated.
    Or as was mentioned the piece GD brings to the table is expertise and lobbyists for government contracts.

    I just checked the GD site... They are heavily into the arms industry beyond just aircraft systems.
    http://www.gd-ots.com/productsbycategory.html

    And holy crap! They make gatling guns in 50 cal? Not sure it's that practical but I'd love to give one a go!
    http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=X1VMHQzwDwc
    Before you suggest that licensing, background checks, or other restrictions for the 2nd Amendment are reasonable... Apply those same ideas to the 1st and 4th Amendments. Then tell me how reasonable they are.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •