Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 39

Thread: Does anyone still prefer the fullsize Aimpoints??

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    South Texas
    Posts
    2,740
    Feedback Score
    52 (98%)
    They are bulkier and have more of a 'blind spot' than the Micros.

    I've always put mine at the very front of the receiver in a lower 1/3 mount and with both eyes open, I've never felt like I needed to peek around the optic to see what was going on.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    AZ
    Posts
    27,206
    Feedback Score
    14 (100%)
    Yeah... it's by no means a deal breaker... just a minor thing I noticed. The C3 is still my go to.
    "You people have too much time on your hands." - scottryan

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    CONUS
    Posts
    4,020
    Feedback Score
    6 (100%)
    i like the micros because of their compactness, however the dot is a bit easier to find on the full size/bigger tube when i'm shooting from weird positions and can't get a proper cheek weld. also once in a while i mount a pvs-14 behind the sight, and the full size one gives me more field of view through the pvs-14, whereas the micro tube is too small. i have both and like them for different things.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    midwest
    Posts
    8,217
    Feedback Score
    4 (100%)
    I've had a T-1 on one of my SBRs for a few years. Never particularly cared for it. I am otherwise about 50-50 Eotech EXPS's and Aimpoint PROs. Definitely prefer the full size RDS. I don't hate the T-1 such that I'd be inclined to dump it, but especially given the cost, I'd be unlikely to ever buy another micro.
    Last edited by Hmac; 12-05-14 at 10:50.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Not here
    Posts
    8,703
    Feedback Score
    0
    I had a brief but intense love affair with the T1 and H1. Next time I buy optics I plan to go for a 1-4 ACOG or something similar.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    1,247
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    A lot of low to med power magnification optics out there offer 1x with red dot style use for cqb and some magnification to go along with if you want it/need it, hard to overlook those.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Posts
    83
    Feedback Score
    -1 (0%)
    Definitely the full-size models. My M2 is still going strong even considering that it has taken a lot of abuse(the exterior shows). The glass is still exceptionally clear and the outer casing is very robust.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    994
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by LoveAR View Post
    What rifle is that?
    Steyr Mannlicher
    http://www.steyrarms.com/products/hu...les/new-sm-12/

    Pricey, but well made rifles.

    P.S. I prefer the larger M2/ M3 Aimpoints too. I use the micro for a back-up sight.
    Last edited by SkiDevil; 12-06-14 at 05:05. Reason: addition

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    209
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    I'm in the market for a t1 micro if any of you lot feel like off loading one.

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Alaska
    Posts
    127
    Feedback Score
    0
    I have a "C" model and T1, and although I love the compactness and light weight of the T1, I still shoot the full size faster... Although the T1 is a 2 MOA, my groups are no better with it, thought they would be... Amazing how accurate that 4MOA dot can be if you are familiar with it...
    " I can't walk with gum in my mouth...It makes it to where I can't breathe"-The Wife Unit

Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •