Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234
Results 31 to 39 of 39

Thread: Does anyone still prefer the fullsize Aimpoints??

  1. #31
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Northern VA
    Posts
    1,156
    Feedback Score
    238 (100%)
    I like them both - T1 on a fwd mount of an AK/M1 Carbine like a scout rifle setup, but love a full size(CompM4ish) on a AR. For more precision I do all sorts of voodoo to get around my astigmatism (larger tube, anti-reflector installed, etc). That said - the TR24G1-4 with a nice green triangle and pretty clear at 1x...
    Glocks are functional tools and nothing else, hence they have no soul - Rob S.

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    Republic of Texas near San Antonio
    Posts
    1,262
    Feedback Score
    0
    I have the PRO, but I've shot a friends H1 a fair bit. While I do like the size/weight, I think the best value for my limited dollars continues to be the PRO. When I hit the Powerball, I'll probably start buying the T1's... Never tried the M series optics...



    Take Care,

    Buzz

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    123
    Feedback Score
    0
    I like the full size as mentioned previously (M4 here), but the QRP's rib spreader knob is getting a tad bit old now. And I'm second guessing my recent desire to mout a magnifier due to top heavy weight, and poor mounting options.
    Free men do not ask permission to bear arms.

  4. #34
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Washington
    Posts
    773
    Feedback Score
    38 (100%)
    Id rather have all T1's due to size but I still have a comp ML2 thats like 5-6 years old and still rockin so I cant complain

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    11
    Feedback Score
    0
    I run M4S on mine. I never liked the look of the short ones on a M4.
    “Be polite, be professional, but have a plan to kill everybody you meet.” Gen. James Mattis, USMC

    USMC Shooting Team
    Distinguished Pistol Shot Badge - 1986

  6. #36
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    1,669
    Feedback Score
    29 (100%)
    FWIW, I bought an M2 and compared it side by side to my PRO. The M2 dot is circular, the PRO is more comma shaped due to astigmatism. All of the micro's all look like giant blobs. The M3 4MOA dot looks like a blob too. I am going to sell the PRO soon and buy another M2.
    Quote Originally Posted by Coal Dragger View Post
    Marines love CLP. Chow, libo, pussy.

    Beyond that everything else is a crap shoot.

  7. #37
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    162
    Feedback Score
    31 (100%)
    ML2/ML3 are geat RDS if you don't mind the slight weight increase over the micros. I use them and like them.

  8. #38
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Washington
    Posts
    773
    Feedback Score
    38 (100%)
    I just spent the weekend shooting with my ML2 and micro and have now decided I like the bigger ones a bit more. I'm thinking about putting the micro on my ak which I don't shoot as much and getting another full size for the gun I use primarily for classes.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  9. #39
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    2,854
    Feedback Score
    7 (100%)
    I like my M4S's. When I hear people bitch about weight, I just figure they are a fat body that has more important things to do rather than stay in shape. Does that mean someone can prefer, say, a T-1 over an M4S, without using weight/size as an objection? No doubt. But the vast majority of complaints are from out of shape keyboard commandos that really couldn't articulate their grievances.

Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •