
Originally Posted by
Failure2Stop
If your COG has the chevron reticle, it will make your 200M shooting less than precise since the 200 is at the apex of the bottom part of the chevron.

This tends to make me hold a little high on my desired target, especially if the fiberoptic isn't taped off.
Wind-drift is also a bit more shakey at 200 since there isn't a readily referenceable wind-hold in the cog and lots of well-meaning folks wind up dialing in an atmospheric unwittingly.
The tendency to hold a bit high with them applies to me too, the TA31 reticle is one of the few I never bother to zero at 50 or 200m if I can help it (even on one of our Table I/II shoots somebody insisted on refining zeroes at 200yd for table 2, unsurprisingly myself and two guys in my fireteam who agreed we should leave it alone were three of the top four scores on that table 2). I'd literally rather zero the ACOG at 36yd and be off some vertically than be in doubt for both trying to make the crotch of chevron be the POA and tend to be off (aggravated by shooting position NPOA changes). When I get the chance, I'll zero for 100m in a partially supported sitting as that tends to produce ideal results for me. I'm not unwilling to make windage adjustments at 200yd/200m, but that's only in dead still wind conditions; for that type of optic if I'm on at 36yd it's close, and on at 100yd/100m is perfect... I'm much more likely to be a source of error beyond that because being so tight to the optic means that I can make a half millimeter move of cornea position and do more to affect POI relative to sight picture than making one-click adjustments (especially since forgetting to smack the turrets tight just once is plenty to throw the whole data set off).
عندما تصبح الأسلحة محظورة, قد يملكون حظرون عندهم فقط
کله چی سلاح منع شوی دی، یوازي غلوونکۍ یی به درلود
Semper Fi
"Being able to do the basics, on demand, takes practice. " - Sinister
Bookmarks