Objective Lens Size

[tylerw02]

Hell a better solution, warne makes a set of QDs for it.

http://kinneysshootingsupply.com/war...gs-p-1207.html


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[wingspar]

Hell a better solution, warne makes a set of QDs for it.

http://kinneysshootingsupply.com/war...gs-p-1207.html

Perfect. Thank you very much. No way could I come up with anything like that. I’m just not good at knowing what to type into search engines. From the part number on that page, I was able to find this on Amazon, but no part numbers are referenced at all on Amazon. Is this the same ring you linked to?

[bluebayou]

The Amazon link is for the high rings at .535". The part number, 2B1LM, is under Product Description on the Amazon page. "2" is for high ring and "L" is quick release.

The one that Tyler linked is for the medium ring at .425".

Warne ring heights are on page 11 of the Warne guide here:
http://warnescopemounts.com/wp-conte...log-1-4-13.pdf

I don't know what kind of scope that you are going to mount.

I can measure my CZ ring height tomorrow. With mine I have used the Nikon Monarch 4x40 and the Nitrex 1.5-5x32 with no problems.

EDIT: the CZ high rings are .550"

[wingspar]

The Amazon link is for the high rings at .535". The part number, 2B1LM, is under Product Description on the Amazon page. "2" is for high ring and "L" is quick release.

The one that Tyler linked is for the medium ring at .425".

Warne ring heights are on page 11 of the Warne guide here:
http://warnescopemounts.com/wp-conte...log-1-4-13.pdf

I don't know what kind of scope that you are going to mount.

I can measure my CZ ring height tomorrow. With mine I have used the Nikon Monarch 4x40 and the Nitrex 1.5-5x32 with no problems.

EDIT: the CZ high rings are .550"

Another page I could not find on the Warne rings. After reading your post, I looked on that Amazon page, and it took a while to find it, but the part number is there, but I never would have looked there.

It looks like the part number I want is 2B1LM, but if I look at the Warne Catalog, there is no “M” in any of their part numbers. Where does that “M” come from?

The scope will most likely be the Redfield Revolution 2-7x33. Clearing the rear iron sight is the reason for the ring height and the 33mm Objective Lens size. I want to be able to switch from irons to scope and back quickly.

[GH41]

"I want to be able to switch from irons to scope and back quickly"

Have you looked at QD rings?

[tylerw02]

"I want to be able to switch from irons to scope and back quickly"

Have you look at QD rings?

The discussion has been about qd rings.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[bluebayou]

"M" is Matte

[GH41]

The discussion has been about qd rings.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

The Warne rings should be labeled Tool-Less not QD. The levers are not throw levers. Watch the video on Warne's site. You have to unscrew them like any other standard ring set. You just use the lever instead of a nut driver to screw them on and off. In reality a nut driver would probably be faster. The Warne rings may serve the OP's needs but they are not QD.

[tylerw02]

The Warne rings should be labeled Tool-Less not QD. The levers are not throw levers. Watch the video on Warne's site. You have to unscrew them like any other standard ring set. You just use the lever instead of a nut driver to screw them on and off. In reality a nut driver would probably be faster. The Warne rings may serve the OP's needs but they are not QD.

Semantics. But whatever, it appears these will work for him. Have a good one.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[wingspar]

"M" is Matte

Thank you. I wonder how anyone is supposed to figure that one out.

The Warne rings should be labeled Tool-Less not QD. The levers are not throw levers. Watch the video on Warne's site. You have to unscrew them like any other standard ring set. You just use the lever instead of a nut driver to screw them on and off. In reality a nut driver would probably be faster. The Warne rings may serve the OP's needs but they are not QD.

To me, these rings are very much Quick Detatch, and can be removed and reinstalled in seconds with no tools and retains zero. Can you do that with normal rings?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kqSF8P21N38