
Originally Posted by
Rowland_P
The letter states that a "redesign" occurs when the brace is used as a shoulder stock. So, merely using the device in a manner for which it was not designed changes the nature of the device.
So, could it not be argued that misusing a buttstock as a wrist brace constitutes a "redesign" and changes its nature from a buttstock to a legal wrist brace?
Any time a bureaucrat interprets law, they open a can of worms.
I thought of that actually, I believe you're making the point that if you shoulder the Sig brace and "redesign" it as a stock, you can subsequently use it as a brace and revert it to being "designed" as a brace?
The problem is at one point you made and owned an illegal/unregistered sbr. The fact that you no longer own one doesn't matter.
For example, throwing a kilo of meth out the window as cops chase you doesn't reduce your possession charge to littering.
Last edited by Koshinn; 01-17-15 at 18:44.
"I never learned from a man who agreed with me." Robert A. Heinlein
Bookmarks