I know about the letters. I will see if I can get the case info on the actual suits. Not related.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
I know about the letters. I will see if I can get the case info on the actual suits. Not related.
Last edited by skydivr; 12-29-14 at 15:48.
"Those who do can't explain; those who don't can't understand"...
[content removed]
Last edited by softorchestra; 01-05-15 at 22:39.
so
I refuse to participate in online forums which do not show respect to the members or their freedom of speech.
Last edited by DWood; 12-29-14 at 16:21.
Go in peace, but be prepared for violence.
Someone wanting to bring a new product to market that may be questionable would no doubt want clarification by ATF before proceeding with production and sinking a shit ton of money into it. So I can see an inventor wanting to see if it's "kosher". These subsequent, pestering, "Are you really really really sure this is okay?" letters are a detriment. So are YouTube videos showing the product being used in a way that flaunts it in ATF's face. The Sig Brace was okayed by ATF for use on an AR pistol and it should have been left at that. But nooooo, that wasn't good enough.
As far as this internet horseshit about an ATF letter only being good for the specific person it was written to, well I think Renegade addressed that point: it's a fallacy. Quit repeating it. (not you DWood, the others who keep saying it over and over)
11C2P '83-'87
Airborne Infantry
[content removed]
Last edited by softorchestra; 01-05-15 at 22:39.
so
I refuse to participate in online forums which do not show respect to the members or their freedom of speech.
Last edited by DWood; 12-29-14 at 19:36.
Go in peace, but be prepared for violence.
Bookmarks