Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 14 of 14

Thread: spotting scope or target cam opinions

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    FL
    Posts
    9,246
    Feedback Score
    28 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by TXBK View Post
    Was that with the Bullsye or Target Vision system? Target Vision is twice the price of the Bullseye. Does that equal twice the performance? You can get a really nice spotting scope for $1300.
    Both.
    The issues related to signal reception in realistic conditions.
    Second-hand info, take it for what it's worth.
    Jack Leuba
    Director, Military and Government Sales
    Knight's Armament Company
    jleuba@knightarmco.com

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    1,929
    Feedback Score
    45 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Failure2Stop View Post
    Second-hand info, take it for what it's worth.
    That's good enough me. Maybe they can get those issues sorted out some day, because it could be a very useful technology. Until then, the use of steel is still the best option for distance work.
    To educate a man in mind and not in morals is to educate a menace to society. --Theodore Roosevelt--

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Eastern N.C.
    Posts
    355
    Feedback Score
    9 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Hicklinc View Post
    Ok thanks like I said I dont have any experience past 100 realistically how far can you see 223 holes in paper with a scope in the 82sv price range I might be leaning towards getting both the spotting scope for shorter distances and or times where I can't set up the cam and the cam for not perfect lighting and longer range
    In my experience about 300 yards. The qualifiers being mirage, angle of sun, light colored backer, etc.

    Keith

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Huntsville, AL
    Posts
    2,185
    Feedback Score
    26 (100%)
    A simple PTZ camera, a wireless N router operating in the 5gHz band, battery pack, good antennas and good clear Lline of sight and you should be able to easily get video at that range. You could put something like that together for far less than either of those video systems you mentioned.

    We used a very similar system for an unmanned aircraft project back in college, and we got video out to nearly twice that range. That was on a maneuvering vehicle utilizing the 2.4gHz band that's much more crowded and vulnerable to interference.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •