Valerie Jarreett Behind Hillary Clinton E-mail Scandal Leak!

[Noodles]

This is really the only legitimate reason the email scandal is still in the news. If this was a republican lead charge, it would have been news for a day and gone. Dems don't even want her, or they wouldn't mind, but want Warren more.

If the GOP is smart, they'll shut up and let the two factions here battle it out. They aren't though, they'll interrupt their enemies who are making mistakes.

[nimdabew]

This is really the only legitimate reason the email scandal is still in the news. If this was a republican lead charge, it would have been news for a day and gone. Dems don't even want her, or they wouldn't mind, but want Warren more.

If the GOP is smart, they'll shut up and let the two factions here battle it out. They aren't though, they'll interrupt their enemies who are making mistakes.

I can see where you would be going with this, but if Democrats and Republicans are both complaining about one party, then the likely hood of finding commonalities through a larger group of the population would further push her away from a nomination slot. Her time was 2008 and she lost to Obama. I do know that there is a group of people within the US that would vote for her no matter what, so she may get nominated anyways.

[Cincinnatus]

If you air the dirty laundry now (Benghazi, emails, etc...) you simply dampen the shock later when it's brought up and people forget about it. The main issue is what kind of buffoon is the Republican party going to put forth that will all but guarantee another Democratic regime.

Yup. And the RNC would rather lose running a RINO than win running a conservative; the Republican establishment, northeast types loathed Reagan and want to be sure that never happens again.
They hate conservatives more than they oppose liberals; in fact, they prefer to cooperate with liberals more than conservatives.
William Howard Taft had a term for such Republicans: he called them "assistant Democrats."

If Jeb gets the nomination, I'm going third party, and yes I know it is political suicide, but so is electing Jeb or any other RINO.

[SteyrAUG]

If you air the dirty laundry now (Benghazi, emails, etc...) you simply dampen the shock later when it's brought up and people forget about it. The main issue is what kind of buffoon is the Republican party going to put forth that will all but guarantee another Democratic regime.

Yep. The most amazing thing to me, it shouldn't be but it is, is the fact that most people don't even understand Benghazi and the private emails on a server at home are related issues. It's like people thinking the Watergate break in and Nixon bugging the building are unrelated.

[jpmuscle]

Maybe the GOP keeps pushing this as well because they think they could actually win in 2016 and their scared of that? They want to a permanent minority... Maybe the string pullers really want a Warren type in the White House. Gag

[ralph]

If you air the dirty laundry now (Benghazi, emails, etc...) you simply dampen the shock later when it's brought up and people forget about it. The main issue is what kind of buffoon is the Republican party going to put forth that will all but guarantee another Democratic regime.

True. and add to that that Hillary knows that despite the fact that her, and Bill despise the Obama's, They'll stick together, because they're both socalist, marxist progressive's, and as long as Obumbo is in office the DOJ will do nothing, no matter how guilty Hillary is... This is IMO, just more proof that we, as a country, do not have a functioning government.(that is, one that obeys it's own laws...and not one set for "them" and another for "us") Hillary's banking on the fact that most voters are stupid, and will forget all about this by election day..

[Pilot1]

My understanding is that the NYT played a big role in bring this story to the forefront. This has been a bit surprising to many of us since that publication is a liberal rag.

I was surprised at first also, but everything the NYT prints is to advance an agenda. It could be the don't think Hillary is Progressive enough and would be like Bill in office, and compromise when backed into a corner. The Clintons are sell outs, not ideologues. They want money and power, and Dem politics has been the way to get it. Warren, and O'Malley are like Obama. Far, far left, progressive (communist) ideologues.

[cop1211]

There were enough stupid people to elect Obama twice , so my bet is on yet another Dem in the a White House.
To many dummies, and free loaders to elect a Republican.

[Averageman]

I'm willing to bet Jarret did it, I'm also willing to bet she's the one who wanted Hillary for the job. No experiance, no skills, they knew she would fail and ruin her chances to be POTUS.
If the right candidate goes up against her and wants to really take her out the information to do so will be given to him and yes, she'll crack in the debate.

[Outlander Systems]

“The Clintons kind of think the law’s for, like, you ordinary people. You know, they think they are somehow above the law.”
- Rand Paul

If this dude doesn't get the nomination, the GOP deserves to become the next Whig party.