Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 24

Thread: What happens when you press a gun into an attacker's body?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    644
    Feedback Score
    0

    What happens when you press a gun into an attacker's body?

    I've heard people say that when a handgun is fired against a person's body, that the expanding gases seriously complicate the wound. I tested the theory with a S&W 638.

    Link for phones






    Spoiler:










    BB: 586.5 fps, 3.2"

    Impact velocity: approximately 900 fps
    Penetration: 14.1"
    Retained weight: 134.5gr
    Max expansion: 0.554"
    Min expansion: 0.426"


    It definitely tore up the clothing pretty well and added a lot of powder particles to the wound, but it doesn't look like the wound is any worse than normal.

    Would the results be different with a magnum? What about a rifle or shotgun? Were there just not enough gasses from the .38 spl to be a factor?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    2,237
    Feedback Score
    0
    I would like to see the same test performed with a higher pressure round like 9mm or .357 magnum.

    Still a good information though!

    It looks again like that 135 gr Gold Dot just barely has enough velocity to open up. Lower the ambient temperature, have a cartridge on the lower end of the extreme spread, or add a little distance to the target and this particular GD does not open up.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Location
    Behind Enemy Lines
    Posts
    1,584
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    In one of his books, Jeff Cooper describes a suicide where a man placed the business end of a barrel under his chin and blew the top of his head off using only a powder charge. They later found the bullet on the mantlepiece. I would expect the bigger powder volume of a rifle or magnum round to cause more damage than a regular pistol round. Either way, anecdotally at least, the damage from a contact shot is almost certainly worse than from a shot of any reasonable distance long enough for only the bullet to be the wounding mechanism.
    "We must, indeed, all hang together, or assuredly we shall all hang separately." -Benjamin Franklin

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    georgia
    Posts
    218
    Feedback Score
    33 (100%)
    Wow interesting test

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    644
    Feedback Score
    0
    Thanks for watching.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    OR
    Posts
    202
    Feedback Score
    0
    You are describing the "bang stick" effect. A bang stick is a short and single barreled handgun on the end of a short pole. It is used primarily by divers for killing fish. It is also about the only way known to instantly take out a good sized shark. In use, it is jammed against the fish and the barrel slides back enough to cause the primer to contact a firing pin and ignite the cartridge. There may be newer designs out there that I am not yet aware of.

    This is a significant advantage of the revolver in that if the barrel is jammed against an opponent and the trigger is pulled, the gun will still shoot. A short recoil operated auto will usually disconnect and prevent the round from firing. The effect is much greater than just the bullet, as the expanding gases are much higher velocity than the projectile and cause tremendous shock. I always recommend a revolver for defense against bears for this reason.
    Dave

    INNOVATION IS SELDOM ACCOMPLISHED WITHOUT CONTROVERSY.
    My first rule of a gunfight, thanks to John Farnam's wise advice. "Get away from there!"

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    1,085
    Feedback Score
    16 (100%)
    depends on a lot of variables. I had a patient walk in from the ambulance once after trying to eat a shotgun. if you google a bit there are some pretty horrific contact wounds.

    At least from what I saw with the shotgun, that column of air in the barrel may displace the barrel just enough to prevent a clean shot, but also causes pretty massive stellate type lacerations. Not only the bullet track, but also flesh torn from high velocity gasses.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    CONUS
    Posts
    5,168
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Ron3 View Post
    I would like to see the same test performed with a higher pressure round like 9mm or .357 magnum.

    Still a good information though!

    It looks again like that 135 gr Gold Dot just barely has enough velocity to open up. Lower the ambient temperature, have a cartridge on the lower end of the extreme spread, or add a little distance to the target and this particular GD does not open up.

    We fired the 135g Gold Dot into ballistic gelation out of my Model 60 with 1-7/8" barrel. The gelation was shot at a distance of 15'. Rounds fired through 4 layers of denim and at bare gelatin opened up like they were designed to do with decent penetration.

    I was unpleasantly surprised when the 158g LHP +P FBI load I had been carrying for years failed to perform as well. The bullets did not deform at all.
    Train 2 Win

  9. #9
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    644
    Feedback Score
    0
    The Speer 135 gr short barrel load is on the ragged edge of its ability. If you have a "fast" barrel, you should see good results. My 638's barrel seems a touch "slow". Take a look at my other tests. Even ATK's site shows the shot through denim had marginal expansion.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    CONUS
    Posts
    5,168
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by AndrewWiggin View Post
    The Speer 135 gr short barrel load is on the ragged edge of its ability. If you have a "fast" barrel, you should see good results. My 638's barrel seems a touch "slow". Take a look at my other tests. Even ATK's site shows the shot through denim had marginal expansion.
    ATK shows expansion at .577" and penetration at 11". It is identical to what I observed. I measured a MV of 866 fps out of my J Frame. Published MV is 945 fps.

    It's not the best defensive cartridge, but it is pretty good for a small concealable firearm.

    I haven't seen anyone who was shot with it though and that is the acid test of any defensive cartridge.
    Last edited by T2C; 04-11-15 at 17:13.
    Train 2 Win

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •