
Originally Posted by
Iraqgunz
His past conduct is irrelevant. It also doesn't help him when he basically admits "I shot him on accident" and that are other officers who are callous to the fact that he was shot. Remember the charge is manslaughter which means it was negligent. Just as if you are I had an accident and shot someone.
It wasn't intended as an excuse, merely a relevant fact to the situation before he was shot. Locally, some have tried to describe him as an "innocent" victim, because the news isn't reporting who this guy really was. Victim yes, innocent, no. I don't condone the callous comments and I'm not defending the deputy who shot him. Please don't take it that I was.
What if this whole crusade's a charade?
And behind it all there's a price to be paid
For the blood which we dine
Justified in the name of the holy and the divine…
Bookmarks