Interesting read. The problem is that the argument he makes for the A-10 not being ready for the "next war" doesn't hold water. It's no more vulnerable to emerging threats than the F15C/E, F-16, F-18, etc. The only aircraft who have an advantage in that discussion are the F-22 and F35. The A-10 was designed to survive and kill on the battlefields of modern Europe against the Soviet empire and it's very effective and integrated air defenses.
I also disagree with the author's premise that the F-16 would be a great CAS platform if given that to focus upon. It cannot fly slowly enough to ID threats and friendlies on the ground. It has a pathetic payload and range. The F-16 is the airframe that should be retired, not the A-10.
Here is an email I sent to Gen Welsh in the beginning of February. Despite many friends who are still serving telling me he will write me back, that has not happened. I don't really expect him to either. He has sold his soul on this idea and can't back off from it now.
********************************************************************************************
General Welsh,
I'm writing you as a former Air Force officer who is very troubled by what I've seen in the media with regard to the plan to retire the A-10 from service. I'm fully aware of the challenges you face in terms of budgeting for our warfighters, especially when we are forced to operate under continuing resolutions.
A little bit of background for myself, I spent 11 years on active duty and separated as a major in 2006 in order to begin a career in law enforcement. For most of my career I worked the C2 side of Personnel Recovery/CSAR. I spent several years at the AFRCC when it was still at Langley AFB, and I was deployed in 2001, spending 6 months as a CSAR controller in the Joint Search & Rescue Center (JSRC) for CENTCOM. While there I was heavily involved in planning and execution of rescue operations for OSW and OEF. When I left active duty I was the Chief, Special Operations Branch at the AF2ISRC and responsible for the integration of SOF/Personnel Recovery systems for all CAOC's. I understand how the overall air battle is planned and executed.
I provided that so you'd better understand my frame of reference. When OEF kicked off we (the JSRC) were begging for A-10's. The few people with boots on the ground (SOF/OGA) were asking for the same. I am aware you flew the A-10, so I know you understand why we wanted the plane in theater. Instead, General Wald allowed the F-16's in Kuwait (deployed for OSW) to fly missions into Afghanistan. Because of the limited range and payload of the F-16, they needed 3 in flight refuelings to get to their targets, in order to drop 2 bombs, and after a few minutes on station, had to RTB. They of course needed 3 more refuelings to get back to Kuwait. We though the Tanker LNO's in the CAOC were going to lose their minds.
We both know there is no airframe on the planet that can do what the A-10 does. The F-16, even with a Sandy qualified pilot doesn't come close. The F-35 will not come close. Neither plane has the ability to carry the payload the A-10 does. Neither plane can fly slowly enough to positively ID threats and friendlies on the ground. Neither plane can stay on station long enough. And of course neither airplane can survive the abuse the A-10 can. It sill amazes me the F-35 has a single engine. Did the Air Force not learn its lesson with the F-16?
Speaking of... let's discuss the F-16. If you want or need to save money in the budget in order to get the F-35 operational, then there is an obvious choice to those of us outside the "Viper" community. The F-16 typically leads the Air Force in Class A mishaps every year. We have lost far too many lives to the F-16 in peacetime because it tries to be everything and excels at nothing. There is a reason its nickname among the rest of the Air Force is the "Lawn Dart." The F-16 has been protected by the Air Force over and over again because the pilots who fly it lose all objectivity and keep pushing to take on new roles. When I was in Rescue and we heard F-16 pilots were going to get trained as Sandy crews, we laughed. We also knew it was just another attempt to phase out the A-10. There is a reason you have to keep fighting to get rid of and replace the A-10. It's because it works and does the job of protecting ground troops and CSAR crews better than any combat aircraft in the history of this planet. That is not hyperbole. The only aircraft that can come close to the same ability to protect our troops are helicopter gunships.
If you truly want to protect American lives to the best of your ability, and you want to reduce the casualties in peacetime and combat, you would be pushing to retire the F-16. Keeping it in service shows a bias toward the sexy, fun, mach 2 fighters that will not ever perform CAS or RESCORT in an appropriate or effective manner. The best analogy I can think of is a person needing to move his family and dog from New York to California. For that role he buys a Corvette. Sure he looks good in it. Sure it's fun as hell to drive. But it will not accomplish the mission. That's the F-16. It is the real drain on financial and personnel resources. Sadly the F-35 will merely be a more advanced and low-observable version of the Lawn Dart. Do the right thing for our service and all our uniformed personnel - retire the F-16 and use the money saved to keep flying the A-10. Hell, give funding to the F-15E's. They have 2 engines and have respectable payload/TOS numbers. But the real problem in your budget is not the A-10. Retiring it without a suitable replacement will only result in more American lives lost.
I take great pride in my time in uniform, but every time the A-10 subject comes up I am deeply embarrassed by the Air Force and the actions of its leadership. I see media reports of Major General Post threatening charges of treason to anyone speaking positively about the A-10 to the media. I see articles like the one in USA Today where information about fratricide is leaked in order to cast a negative light on the A-10. I sincerely hope these things are not true... but knowing what I do about the system, it would not surprise me. If the measure of an officer is how the current Air Force leadership is behaving, then I'm happy I left. At least I can look myself in the mirror and know that I did not choose form over function - especially when lives were on the line. I've lost count of how many times the Air Force foolishly tried to divest itself of the A-10. Let's do the right thing and choose performance over appearance. Keep the A-10 in the skies overhead.
Sincerely,
XXXX XXXXX
********************************************************************************************
Before you suggest that licensing, background checks, or other restrictions for the 2nd Amendment are reasonable... Apply those same ideas to the 1st and 4th Amendments. Then tell me how reasonable they are.
Reply With Quote
Originally Posted by Voodoochild
Bookmarks