It's sad how broken procurement is. I don't doubt that the A10 is expensive to keep flying, but to shelve it with something that isn't even operational yet is a bit stupid.
Something like a super tucano isn't that cool, but it's practical.
The targeting system on the f35 is amazing, but let's be real, do you really want that thing flying under a few thousand feet? If they are citing costs, how the hell will flight time be cheaper on the f35? Just the fuel usage.....
This thinking of the same plane being tip of the spear, bomb truck, superiority, and CAS machine is retarded.
Everyone prepares as we're going to get in a peer to peer shooting war. Not going to happen. MAD, nuclear or not insures that not happening. We better have thousands of planes, ships and many more thousands of warriors to sacrifice.
So given that, I say yes. Investment in the future is smart. It's what keeps us safe and prosperous. But, since the modern era doesn't seem to really support a shooting war with a peer, let's be realistic and buy/build a cheap CAS platform. One that doesn't have to super cruise and could a good part of the day on a fuel load.
Let the Pentagon keep throwing money endless money at the JSF. Keep them happy. Go buy some A29's, fly them cheap or licence and build then here. Just move the A10 pilots over....... Win.
Sorry for my rant, I know a few guys over at hill field, (they do A10 and various other plane over haul) and some of the stories just blow my mind.


Reply With Quote
- WillBrink /// "Comey is a smarmy, self righteous mix of J. Edgar Hoover and a gay Lurch from the "Adams Family"." -Averageman

Bookmarks