which one would you choose? i know the LE version has the "restricted" markings. would you spend extra for the markings?
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
which one would you choose? i know the LE version has the "restricted" markings. would you spend extra for the markings?
Last edited by Jwknutson17; 05-26-15 at 10:53.
Philippians 4:13
I much prefer the "For Civilian Use Only" marked rifles.
Whichever is cheaper.
Why do the loudest do the least?
No. Do not pay the extra money for the restricted writing.
C4
Why pay the extra money for verbiage? I can put it to better use elsewhere.
____________________________________
Duck Tape can't fix stupid but it sure muffles the sound!
NO !
I have a Colt LE6920 with the "restricted " roll mark .
The only reason I bought it is that it was available at a
decent price back when we thought a ban was coming
and it was hard to find anything .
If I could get a good trade for it I would get rid of it .
State and local cops don't know the laws about these
and it can get you attention you don't want .
I'd pay less for the oppressive anti 2A markings.
I'd pay extra for: "Restricted: For Civilian/FREEFOR Use Only."
Bookmarks