|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
I don't know that I would say it's that extreme, but I did experience it to a degree with the family of my first wife. She and her family were from New York, and I'm born and raised in North Florida. Among the things they would look down on was my gun ownership. "Must be one of those south things" was one of the remarks about it.
"Those who 'abjure' violence can only do so because others are committing violence on their behalf."
Yes...Southerners are portrayed in that matter by other Americans. Where the hell have you been hiding?
Unless you are from the South or have lived here a long time...you have no concept of how many have a sort of internal pride in being Southern. Northern people just do not feel that way about their states. Drive around anywhere in Texas and you will see the flag on everything. I don't even remember what the state flag looks like in most Northeastern states - I never saw it unless it was flying over a county seat or govt building!
Walk up and down the streets of Houston, Birmingham, Jackson, Baton Rouge or Biloxi and you will not find anyone that is dying to move to Connecticut or New Jersey! LOL
This partly explains how many Southern people DO see the Confederate Battle Flag as a symbol of Southern Pride. Many are really disgusted that the Klan has tarnished the flag's image.
Last edited by brickboy240; 06-22-15 at 15:33.
A war memorial to traitors... to the United States of America. There is no way of getting around that point. I could be entirely wrong, but I have never heard of another country that puts up a memorial to honor a group of losing traitorous rebels that kicked off one of a the bloodiest conflicts in history resulting in the deaths of almost 1 million people. Seems incredibly backwards in every sense.
Concur, but the surprise for me was the genocide comment. I've never actually heard that suggested. I think I'd have harsh words for anyone making that sort of comment.
As to the state pride piece, I've seen state pride in other places, such as New York, especially in the city, but it's more of a "If you're not from here, go f-yourself" kind of pride. I find the Southern version more palatable. Then again, I'm Midwest by birth and a Texan by choice, so it's hardly surprising I can't stand New York.
"We must, indeed, all hang together, or assuredly we shall all hang separately." -Benjamin Franklin
I think that "Traitors" might be a little strong.
I would suggest that you really might want to take another look at a couple more sources for your information before using the term "Traitors".
If you and I have an agreement to start and build a business and decades later I feel that I am being mistreated in our partnership, why shouldn't we agree to disagree, dissolve our union and pursue our business's independently?
That may be a oversimplification of events, but perhaps not so much. You may also say that the South fired the first shots, but again there were actions taken by the North that were not so far from the very reasons the Colonies separated from England.
Take a minute and think about what might have been the benefits to an amicable separation of the North and South. In the end both would have become stronger and more versatile economies and the million or so casualties never would have happened.
For the most part the lessons learned from such a dissolution might have been necessary to bringing them back together again under more amicable terms to fight a common enemy or to rebuild a troubled economy.
Perhaps, and we will never know for sure; had that happened peacefully we wouldn't now be under the yoke of a stronger than intended Federal Government and States rights might still mean something.
But again, the winners right the history, but I think in this case every fifty years they rewrite the history to make it a bit kinder and more progressive to suit the needs of current policy, truth be damned.
Do we allow the Federal Government to dictate the removal of that flag? Do we remove it from hats and bumper stickers next and burn all books that oppose the current view of history? Or should we allow the history to stand, support opposing views and allow the States to fly the flag they choose?
So you see, perhaps we haven't become that 'enlightened" yet, perhaps ugly as it may be history should be remembered and taught not revised. The warts and scars and stupidity are a part of what got us here.
Last edited by Koshinn; 06-22-15 at 16:27.
"I never learned from a man who agreed with me." Robert A. Heinlein
Who would have thought. Had we just got rid of the SC flag racists would not have anything to cling to. Hot damn.. Brilliant. While we're at it lets not call a football team the redskins because it's inflammatory and degrading to some people by choice. While we're at it I find teams with Giants in their name derogatory and insulting towards fat people, moose tracks ice cream is insulting towards women who get the indirect toe reference. I think we should revamp the conceptual social contract to include not upsetting anyone anytime too. That will definitely stop bad people from doing bad things.
“Answer The Bell...” J.W.
Bookmarks