Page 2 of 8 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 77

Thread: SCOTUS Upholds ACA Subsidies (King v Burwell)

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Houston, TX, USA
    Posts
    4,024
    Feedback Score
    0
    No kidding. I have my supplies and ammo...let's get this American crash over with while I am still young enough to help in the recovery!

    The slow and painful path is growing old.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    LV
    Posts
    755
    Feedback Score
    5 (100%)
    This Santaclausocrasy isn't sustainable anywhere. A couple of quarters of GDP revised to negative with the only "growth" being spending for Obamacare should be a warning if there were any adults in the room. Yet the future, with either party in charge, likely won't change. Charles Hughes-Smith's Neofeudalism Principle #1:: "If the citizenry cannot replace a dysfunctional government and/or limit the power of the financial Aristocracy at the ballot box, the nation is a democracy in name only." We are now just a democracy in name only.

    Well, back to work. All those lazy ****ers need someone to prop them up and pay their "subsidies" so they keep voting for subsidies. Welcome to the U.S. of Assholes - the unholy union of statism, corruption, and fraud.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    VA
    Posts
    7,711
    Feedback Score
    10 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by interfan View Post
    This Santaclausocrasy isn't sustainable anywhere. A couple of quarters of GDP revised to negative with the only "growth" being spending for Obamacare should be a warning if there were any adults in the room. Yet the future, with either party in charge, likely won't change. Charles Hughes-Smith's Neofeudalism Principle #1:: "If the citizenry cannot replace a dysfunctional government and/or limit the power of the financial Aristocracy at the ballot box, the nation is a democracy in name only." We are now just a democracy in name only.

    ... and the next natural order of things will be for Hillary to be appointed President.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Houston, TX, USA
    Posts
    4,024
    Feedback Score
    0
    Wanna bet they uphold gay marriage as well?

    Yes, us getting Hillary next is almost a done deal. The GOP will nominate Jeb and he will go down in flames as big media makes him squirm over his views on gays, abortion and maybe rape or something else silly. You think they nit-picked on Romney...you just wait.

    The media will get Hillary elected. When you control the messaging...sadly...you control the election.

    Keep storing up guns, mags and ammo....

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    LV
    Posts
    755
    Feedback Score
    5 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by tb-av View Post
    ... and the next natural order of things will be for Hillary to be appointed President.
    It is her turn, don't you know. The wise and benevolent overlords have made their choice.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Huntsville, AL
    Posts
    2,185
    Feedback Score
    26 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by SomeOtherGuy View Post
    Hard to put an exact date on it, but there's hundreds of nails in its coffin now.

    Those of us who try to believe in some principle of law greater than a fraud that some con-artists in DC can pretend they got 51% support for will need to refocus on something positive.
    I just say that because of what it does to separation of powers. SCOTUS is now in the business of writing laws wholesale. If a law is drafted poorly so it won't work, no problem, just ignore the plain meaning instead of ruling as the plain language requires and letting congress fix it.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    3,793
    Feedback Score
    19 (100%)
    nova, I agree. But this isn't the only or very first time. Maybe the Republic has been dead for years now? I think that historians 200+ years from now will probably look at 1988-2000 as the last years of the Republic, 2001-2010 (or so) as the start of empire, and 2011-onward (who knows) as fully imperial. We still have the window dressing of a Constitutional republic, but that's not how things function today.
    ____________________________________________________________________________________
    Use InfoGalactic instead of Wikipedia - avoid Wikipedia's left bias

    https://infogalactic.com/info/Main_Page
    ____________________________________________________________________________________

    Product reviews stating "Only 4 stars because I haven't used it yet" are an idiot's signature.
    ____________________________________________________________________________________

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    4,232
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    So when will we begin to follow the words of Thomas Jefferson and begin refreshing the Tree of Liberty?
    ..It was you to me who taught
    In Jersey anythings' legal, as long as you don't get caught.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    OUTPOST 31
    Posts
    10,406
    Feedback Score
    30 (100%)
    I have no words.... Ugh..
    “Answer The Bell...” J.W.

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Suburbs of Philadelphia
    Posts
    1,178
    Feedback Score
    0
    With Republicans like Roberts and most of the GOP who needs Democrats?
    ”Congress have no power to disarm the militia. Their swords, and every other terrible implement of the soldier, are the birthright of an American… The unlimited power of the sword is not in the hands of either the federal or state government, but, where I trust in God it will ever remain, in the hands of the people”
    ~Tench Coxe

Page 2 of 8 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •