What is the single biggest problem with America today?

**Belloc** · 06-30-15, 13:48

Originally Posted by WickedWillis

No, I am implying that "Christians" And boy, do I use that term loosely these days, are so caught up in what others are doing that they don't reflect on their own sins and transgressions against God.

I don't think that is it at all. The petulant scream of the lunatic leftists that "what we do in our bedrooms is no one's business!" has always been, as we again plainly see, a complete and total lie. It was always a fundamentalist agenda hell bent on indoctrination of innocent children and on forcing people to equate homosexual sodomy with the bond of intimacy between a man and his wife. No one very much cared what they were doing until they themselves decided to make what they do in their bedrooms everyone else's business.

To wit:

The New School: Homosexual Propaganda and Your Kids

The logic works like this: If homosexual acts are moral, as so many now insist, then they should be normative. If they are normative, they should be taught in our schools as a standard. If they are a standard, they should be enforced. And so it has come, and is coming, to be. Education is an essential part of the drive to universalize the rationalization for homosexual behavior; so it must become a mandatory part of the curriculum. What began as a plea for diversity ends with a demand for conformity.

The government is using taxpayer's money to indoctrinate children in a militant leftist depraved ideological agenda. This was always, from the beginning, their intention.
And they do not even deny this. In the same way that many gun-grabbers actually admit that their goal is confiscation and complete prohibition of private ownership of firearms, so too many of the so-called "homosexual marriage" advocates admit that they in fact been lying the entire time as to what is their real agenda here.

http://thefederalist.com/2014/04/09/...mily-autonomy/

“Gay marriage is a lie,” announced gay activist Masha Gessen in a panel discussion last year at the Sydney Writers’ Festival. “Fighting for gay marriage generally involves lying about what we’re going to do with marriage when we get there. It’s a no-brainer that the institution of marriage should not exist.”

**WickedWillis** · 06-30-15, 13:53

Originally Posted by Belloc

I don't think that is it at all. The petulant scream of the lunatic leftists that "what we do in our bedrooms is no one's business!" has always been, as we again plainly see, a complete and total lie. It was always a fundamentalist agenda hell bent on indoctrination of innocent children and on forcing people to equate homosexual sodomy with the bond of intimacy between a man and his wife. No one very much cared what they were doing until they themselves decided to make what they do in their bedrooms everyone else's business.

To wit:

The government is using taxpayer's money to indoctrinate children in a militant leftist depraved ideological agenda. This was always, from the beginning, their intention.
And they do not even deny this. In the same way that many gun-grabbers actually admit that their goal is confiscation and complete prohibition of private ownership of firearms, so too many of the so-called "homosexual marriage" advocates admit that they in fact been lying the entire time as to what is their real agenda here.

I still view a difference in the Government's stance on marriage, and holy matrimony.

**Belloc** · 06-30-15, 14:07

Originally Posted by WickedWillis

I still view a difference in the Government's stance on marriage, and holy matrimony.

But is that not rather immaterial to the fact that even Judge Roberts, who in his dissent pretty much admitted that he was for the individual states legalising homosexual "marriage", flat out blasted the majority decision by these miscreants as being pretty much a full-on liberal legislating from the bench attack on the Constitution?

**interfan** · 06-30-15, 16:22

Originally Posted by Belloc

But is that not rather immaterial to the fact that even Judge Roberts, who in his dissent pretty much admitted that he was for the individual states legalising homosexual "marriage", flat out blasted the majority decision by these miscreants as being pretty much a full-on liberal legislating from the bench attack on the Constitution?