Page 2 of 7 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 62

Thread: SCOTUS ruling on Gay marriage = national reciprocity?

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Location
    Kansas
    Posts
    712
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    You're reaching if you're trying to find a positive in this. A far more likely result from the SCOTUS's regutting of the 10th Amendment would be to overturn any Second Amendment Protection/Preservation Acts that have been passed by the various States, or, a smack down of the the various concealed carry laws as they pose a danger to citizens that don't have them. Equal protection under the law, right?

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Not here
    Posts
    8,703
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Alpha-17 View Post
    You're reaching if you're trying to find a positive in this. A far more likely result from the SCOTUS's regutting of the 10th Amendment would be to overturn any Second Amendment Protection/Preservation Acts that have been passed by the various States, or, a smack down of the the various concealed carry laws as they pose a danger to citizens that don't have them. Equal protection under the law, right?
    I've actually had an epiphany on this. Let's suppose for the sake of supposin' that the recent SCOTUS decisions really are the result of some secret NSA-meta-data-based blackmail or something.

    TPTB could very well be scouring the country for some fast-track court case that would allow them to revisit and overturn Heller.

    I know, I know, the SCOTUS very rarely reverses itself, but if it's been compromised somehow, anything could happen.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Posts
    1,571
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    I agree it opens the door to all kinds lawsuits. Polygamy, age of Consent, ccw, nfa, legal pot, legal any drug really......

    More watering down of states making their own choices and voting them. Legislation by court is so much easier anyway, right......er.....um.......

    They are going to pick and choose of course. But still, high profile lawyers dream come true.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    13,117
    Feedback Score
    0
    This SCROTUS would turn equal protection into equal peril.

    Ok, let's say it passes, as we have seen in other gun rulings anti-gun states and cities just don't follow the law. Sure you can CCW anywhere, after you spend a couple nights in jail while they verify your credentials.

    Actually, this is something the right should take away from the Progressives- they lose court fights and don't follow the ruling anyways. We need to start dragging our feet and skirting the law.
    I just did two lines of powdered wig powder, cranked up some Lee Greenwood, and recited the BoR. - Outlander Systems

    I'm a professional WAGer - WillBrink /// "Comey is a smarmy, self righteous mix of J. Edgar Hoover and a gay Lurch from the "Adams Family"." -Averageman

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    11,706
    Feedback Score
    43 (100%)
    This falls flat on its face when you understand that all states allow some form of legalized firearm carry. Whether shall or may issue is irrelevant, and that is the argument which will be used to ensure SCOTUS never even sees it let alone overturns any may-issue laws.
    Why do the loudest do the least?

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Tennessee
    Posts
    8,465
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Eurodriver View Post
    This falls flat on its face when you understand that all states allow some form of legalized firearm carry. Whether shall or may issue is irrelevant, and that is the argument which will be used to ensure SCOTUS never even sees it let alone overturns any may-issue laws.
    No, but what is relevant is that those same states that *technically* allow CCW (but in reality don't) do not have to honor a CCW from another state. However, now that gay marriage is nationally sanctioned states that don't allow gay marriage must now honor it. Seems what's good for the goose is good for the gander.

    Do I think it will get traction? No (unfortunately). Do I think it will happen if someone has the balls and $$$ to push it? Still no. Do I think it's the right thing to do, given this force-it-down-your-throats thing has been sanctioned? Abso-freaking-lutely!
    11C2P '83-'87
    Airborne Infantry

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    2,246
    Feedback Score
    22 (100%)
    I remember when I lived in CA and frequented Calguns a lot of people there including lawyers thought this would help their situation about reciprocity. It certainly makes sense to me, however I don't know if it will work out that way in court.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    2,678
    Feedback Score
    16 (100%)
    Reciprocity already exists for license plates.

    Its not going to help here.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    4,232
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    If half the gun owners in the country have $5 toward a lawsuit we would be able to push this to SCOTUS.
    ..It was you to me who taught
    In Jersey anythings' legal, as long as you don't get caught.

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    TN
    Posts
    1,384
    Feedback Score
    0
    Concealed carry reciprocity is not going to happen. The reason why is the current leftist majority in the Supreme Court doesn't follow the constitution and is simply making shit up as it goes along.

Page 2 of 7 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •