Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 24

Thread: Anyone played with a 12.5" Mid-length Gas System?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    209
    Feedback Score
    44 (100%)

    Anyone played with a 12.5" Mid-length Gas System?

    I like the recoil impulse on a 14.5" mid-length gas system better than the recoil impulse on a 14.5" carbine-length gas system.

    Would I like the recoil impulse on a 12.5" mid-length gas system better than a 12.5" carbine-length setup?

    The reason I'm even considering this is this barrel/gas block combo I ran across that looks intriguing...

    govnah_12_5_mid.jpg

    http://micromoa.com/12-5-midlength-5...rrel-w-govnah/

    I have no affiliation with the company.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    401
    Feedback Score
    0
    I would expect it to be a picky eater. 16" rifle gassed "dissipators" tend to be hard to make run well, and this is a similar concept.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    2,837
    Feedback Score
    16 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Junkie View Post
    I would expect it to be a picky eater. 16" rifle gassed "dissipators" tend to be hard to make run well, and this is a similar concept.
    All of the dissys I've seen were all carbine gas, but had a FSB installed at the rifle position to make the sight radius as long as possible.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Tucson, AZ
    Posts
    293
    Feedback Score
    0
    I messed with an early warsport upper that was proprietary as all hell. I ended up cutting down an FN 14.5 middy to 12 and opening the port to .096 and it would cycle PMC on an H Buffer with an A2. That being said, I didnt feel any real advantage in recoil over a properly ported 12.5 carbine length upper. It was minimal.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    401
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by bp7178 View Post
    All of the dissys I've seen were all carbine gas, but had a FSB installed at the rifle position to make the sight radius as long as possible.
    Both styles are available, many people call the style you speak of mock dissipators. I suppose a Colt 605 would have been a better example.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    2,815
    Feedback Score
    8 (100%)
    BCM 12.5" Kino and be done with it

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Miami
    Posts
    177
    Feedback Score
    18 (85%)
    Quote Originally Posted by scooter22 View Post
    BCM 12.5" Kino and be done with it
    THIS. If all you are after is more rail.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    1,710
    Feedback Score
    204 (100%)
    Depends on the gas port size. And that Govnah?? gas block. Properly ported 12.5 carbine barrels can have very little impulse. I know a few guys on here that run 12.5 mids and have great results with the barrel ported properly (aka large) to run reliably. If running a suppressor I would say go for it. If not, I would rather spend my money on a properly ported barrel and run an A5 system to achieve same results with increased reliability.

    I have no experience with Govnah so I don't know what if any part that plays in the system your looking at.
    Philippians 4:13

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    SOMD
    Posts
    908
    Feedback Score
    50 (100%)
    I was going to build a suppressed only 12.5" Mid using that Micromoa barrel. I decided that was not crazy enough and am trying an 11.5 Mid + SLR sentry. It has a huge port .095" to run unsuppressed I suppose. I bought a cheap Trek TM and will see how it all works out.

    The guy from AR Performance sells a 12.5 Mid also and if you search you can find the last thread where they discussed 12.5" Mids.

    It wasn't that long ago that people poo-poo'd the 14.5 Mid as being too finicky, but they seem to be accepted today. A proper 12.5" Mid should be ok too (looks like the same dwell time as a 10.5" carbine, no?). I think my 11.5 Mid might be a nightmare...
    Last edited by Rayrevolver; 07-08-15 at 10:09.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    401
    Feedback Score
    0
    The farther from the breech you are, the lower the pressure gets and the higher the velocity gets, so I would expect you'd need more barrel length past the gas port for a longer gas system. Dwell time for the midlength will be shorter than for the carbine with the same distance from gas port to muzzle, and pressure will be lower as well. That's not to say it can't be made to work though.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •