Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 29

Thread: Demonstrable Accuracy Gains from a Thick Billet Upper?

  1. #11
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    395
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Koshinn View Post
    I just wish MURs worked with foldable offset sights. That's really annoying me right now, to the point that I'm considering selling my 16" Noveske Recon upper and building one with a standard upper and KMR or Geissele rail.
    what the hell do you need with foldable offset sights.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    395
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by TehLlama View Post
    I have one of nearly every variant of the Vltor MUR upper, and those things are excellent. My most accurate upper is a Centurion complete unit with a plain forged upper, but a really nice Mk12 barrel.

    To say that the upper isn't going to provide accuracy gains is pretty much established. The MUR looks good, is fairly easy to deal with, and the upper/handguard fitment is truly exceptional, but even I classify going with those uppers are more show than go.

    Better ammunition, better glass, better trigger, better barrel in that order in terms of cost -> ROI. Better ammo is cheap performance, the next two are all about minimizing introduction of human error into the accuracy equation, then a better barrel/muzzle device/suppressor can be the best approach to extract more accuracy.
    What is your definition of accuracy?

    can you put five 1/2" five shot groups on this target?


  3. #13
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Vegas
    Posts
    6,717
    Feedback Score
    5 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by rcoodyar15 View Post
    what the hell do you need with foldable offset sights.
    Because a magnified optic makes it hard to use regular BUIS and I prefer to have them folding so they're out of the way when they aren't needed.
    "I never learned from a man who agreed with me." Robert A. Heinlein

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    NM
    Posts
    4,157
    Feedback Score
    10 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Koshinn View Post
    I just wish MURs worked with foldable offset sights. That's really annoying me right now, to the point that I'm considering selling my 16" Noveske Recon upper and building one with a standard upper and KMR or Geissele rail.
    I've had the same issue - I'm able to run the rear off the handguard with the big apeture only, but it's not the most ideal feeling. It worked well enough I decided to pick up a second set of KAC offsets after getting that ironed out, but I agree it's a big issues with the MUR-1A

    My definition of accuracy is real-world 6" diameter 10-shot groups at 400m from anything supported for most applications - I figure I'm good enough to do that with a 3/4MOA rifle/ammunition pairing in anything that doesn't qualify as 'windy - gusty' from supported. I realize this isn't amazing for the internet, but I'm not that gifted a precision shooter, but I know I can shoot very well within some disciplines (4x Expert w/ M16, despite being seriously awful at 200 standing - as soon as I got a TA31RCO it was possibles on both Table1 rapid fires and minimum 97 Table 2/3 shoots from there) - with fantastic equipment and ideal conditions I'm sure I could do 3/4MOA, open that up two-fold and I'm at my aforementioned accuracy target.

    Offset irons make sense because one can't cowitness the irons with a zoom optic or low powered variable. Not ideal for shooting with irons, but far better than the next best thing for most applications.
    عندما تصبح الأسلحة محظورة, قد يملكون حظرون عندهم فقط
    کله چی سلاح منع شوی دی، یوازي غلوونکۍ یی به درلود
    Semper Fi
    "Being able to do the basics, on demand, takes practice. " - Sinister

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    914
    Feedback Score
    4 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by rcoodyar15 View Post
    What is your definition of accuracy?

    can you put five 1/2" five shot groups on this target?

    That's a hell of a challenge for most who say their ARs shoot .5 MOA. I'll admit that I can't with any of my best ARs- at least not consistently. I might pull a ringer target, but that would not be the norm. I can do five 3/4" MOA groups, but even then I might screw the pooch on one group.

    This is typical and is recent:



    My bolt guns are better.
    Last edited by Warg; 07-15-15 at 00:53.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    395
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Warg View Post
    That's a hell of a challenge for most who say their ARs shoot .5 MOA. I'll admit that I can't with any of my best ARs- at least not consistently. I might pull a ringer target, but that would not be the norm. I can do five 3/4" MOA groups, but even then I might screw the pooch on one group.

    This is typical and is recent:



    My bolt guns are better.

    now that is damn good shooting. My opinion if you can shoot those 5 five shot groups and average under 1 moa you are doing great. I am impressed.

    I have been trying for over a year now off and on and I still haven't been able to do it. Always that flyer or your concentration goes or something happens. Fun trying though.

    I just get tired of hearing about all these 1/2" and 1/4" AR's. Show me you can do it consistently. Shooting a .375 group last year doesn't cut it. Can you expect you rifle to shoot a half inch group on any given day?

    bolt guns don't count. Hell a good bench rest .22 rimfire will outshoot 95% of AR's at 100 yards as long as there is no wind.
    Last edited by rcoodyar15; 07-15-15 at 05:39.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    401
    Feedback Score
    0
    It's always fun seeing people with no idea how to shoot. That's one of the scary things about public ranges... having trouble keeping all the shots on paper at 100yd supported for example.

    In my experience most rifles outshoot most people, but there are a significant number of people who can shoot (just not as many as can't).

  8. #18
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    395
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Junkie View Post
    It's always fun seeing people with no idea how to shoot. That's one of the scary things about public ranges... having trouble keeping all the shots on paper at 100yd supported for example.

    In my experience most rifles outshoot most people, but there are a significant number of people who can shoot (just not as many as can't).
    my rifles can outshoot me.

    At my last gun range I used to help the range master put together target stands. Typical 1x2 uprights 18" apart in a 2x4 base. never could understand why the shooters were always hitting those uprights. you have to be really bad to miss the bull at 100 yrds by nearly a foot.

    I have a buddy who loves the old mosins. he can just about beat anyone at the range with iron sights.

    then you have the guy that shows up with his combat vest with clips hanging all off it and leg holster with a $3000 ar tricked out with all the options like he was in Afganistan.

    public range is almost as much fun as the boat ramp follies on a holiday weekend.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    914
    Feedback Score
    4 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by rcoodyar15 View Post
    now that is damn good shooting. My opinion if you can shoot those 5 five shot groups and average under 1 moa you are doing great. I am impressed.

    I have been trying for over a year now off and on and I still haven't been able to do it. Always that flyer or your concentration goes or something happens. Fun trying though.

    I just get tired of hearing about all these 1/2" and 1/4" AR's. Show me you can do it consistently. Shooting a .375 group last year doesn't cut it. Can you expect you rifle to shoot a half inch group on any given day?

    bolt guns don't count. Hell a good bench rest .22 rimfire will outshoot 95% of AR's at 100 yards as long as there is no wind.
    Thanks. It certainly doesn't come easy and those flyers are hard to figure out. I'm still unsure if it's the nature of these rifles or the difficulty in shooting them as my bolt guns don't exhibit these variations.

    Funny you mention the .22 as I've a stock $360 CZ 452 with a cheap optic that will out shoot most of my ARs absent wind. Best bang for the buck IMO regarding precision shooting and discipline, but there's only a little carryover to the AR platform.

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    CONUS
    Posts
    4,209
    Feedback Score
    6 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by rcoodyar15 View Post
    never could understand why the shooters were always hitting those uprights. you have to be really bad to miss the bull at 100 yrds by nearly a foot.
    Because they're not doing it at 25 yds or using a boresighter for a new optic installation. Many new shooters slap on a new scope, then wonder why they're not on paper at 100 yds.

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •