Page 2 of 7 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 65

Thread: Melonite vs. Chrome Lined Longevity

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    401
    Feedback Score
    0
    I found some testing of Nitride vs unlined: http://www.superiorbarrels.com/Barre...%20Testing.htm but they don't compare it to chrome. I know nothing about the source, found it linked from here: https://sites.google.com/site/freeba...lonite-and-qpq which I can't verify either.

    I'd really like to find it compared well to chrome lined but haven't found that yet.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    College Station, Texas
    Posts
    1,539
    Feedback Score
    6 (100%)
    The answers you seek are usually in technology of machining and manufacturing textbooks.

    Nitriding is usually an external treatment of the metal lending it surface-hardening, usually by gas treatment or salt bath immersion. Chrome-plating is an external plating treatment that adds thickness as chrome is externally added.

    Nitriding means you have to start with a quality-rifled barrel of good alloy. A shit barrel nitrided will give you a surface-hardened shit barrel. A chrome-lined barrel may or may not last as long, depending on how it was plated.

    Chrome lining starts to wear from the first round fired. Sectioned GI barrels will show you the throat goes first, followed by the chrome on the lands at the leade. Poorly-plated chrome barrels will wear faster if there are hydrogen embrittlement defects.

    No barrel will last forever.

    Your best bang-for-the-buck (so to speak, no pun intended) would be to start with a high quality hand-lapped barrel (preferably cut-rifled) and have it nitrided. If you plan to use it as a general-purpose mag dump blaster then any barrel will do -- it will usually go to shit anyway as it's exposed to high heat (the surface treatment won't save the barrel as the base material is abused by excessive heat).

    Superior Barrels in Georgia did an excellent job with Walther barrels but it didn't seem to be able to keep up with demand. Pity, too, because they did some excellent documentation.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    97
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by lysander View Post
    Barrel life depends on a number of things, aside from rate of fire and how high the sustained barrel temperature is, the type of propellant you use has a lot to do with it. Double based powders tend to run hot and shorten barrel life. (I like to use cool, single base extruded powders.)

    That said, all things being equal, (rate of fire, sustained temperature, flame temperature, pressure, etc.) a chrome-lined barrel will always outlast a nitride barrel. However, chrome is a heavy metal which is deposited onto the tube surface using aqueous electro-deposition. The chromic acid used in the deposition process is a hazardous substance because it contains hexavalent chrome. Hexavalent chromium is a major problem when it comes to environmental pollution prevention efforts and worker safety. Hexavalent chromium, in the aqueous liquid and misting forms, is a known carcinogen which is extremely expensive to dispose of because of its toxic nature. Chrome plating will only get more and more expensive.

    For the above reason the Military has been constantly looking for processes that can replace chrome plated bores, especially in big guns. They haven found one that is better. All of the Power-Point and reports seem to show that nitriding only gets you to 80% 85% of the life of a chrome bore. For me, that plenty good enough given the price difference between nitride and chrome plating.
    Excellent summary.

    The ARL and other research laboratories have been developing novel innovative processes, but not just due environmental concerns, adherence to OSHA's permissible exposure limits, and hazardous waste, as mentioned above, but also due to the development of modern and advanced propellants that have higher flame temperatures, coupling that with the propensity of cracks formed during plating process which provides a path of erosion to the substrate shortening life.




    Quote Originally Posted by cutter_spc View Post
    I would like to see some accurate data on this subject too.
    Quote Originally Posted by Junkie View Post
    I'm having trouble finding the reports you speak of, is there one you can link?
    Quote Originally Posted by WS6 View Post
    I have heard similar, but I would also be interested in seeing the data.
    As lysander mentioned, research I've seen is primarily on large caliber weapons systems, I can't remember the paper I read awhile back, that had some interesting test results, evaluating a case hardened tube, nitrided, and was hard chrome plated as well.



    http://www.dtic.mil/ndia/2002gun/waterfield.pdf

    While I was doing a literature review, stumbled on an interesting ARL article, noting the possible benefits of using high nitrogen based propellants that would reduce barrel erosion, by effectively providing in situ nitriding, though that would assume the bore was in the white.

    http://www.arl.army.mil/arlreports/2006/ARL-TR-3795.pdf

  4. #14
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    VA/OH
    Posts
    29,630
    Feedback Score
    33 (100%)
    Three of the largest gun manufacturers have tested CL VS Melonite and stuck with CL for the simple reason of longevity. If the Chrome is done right, you will get better groups over the long haul. Now if you say that you don't shoot a lot and accuracy is what your about, then a good CMV barrel that has been properly honed will probably be a good fit for you.


    C4

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    401
    Feedback Score
    0
    Sinister and Ming, thank you for your posts. Obviously if you start with a turd you end up with a polished turd, whether you chrome it or nitride it. I'm surprised how much faster the nitride Mk44 barrel wears out.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    McKinney, TX
    Posts
    3,253
    Feedback Score
    22 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by C4IGrant View Post
    Three of the largest gun manufacturers have tested CL VS Melonite and stuck with CL for the simple reason of longevity. If the Chrome is done right, you will get better groups over the long haul. Now if you say that you don't shoot a lot and accuracy is what your about, then a good CMV barrel that has been properly honed will probably be a good fit for you.


    C4
    Can you tell us which manufacturers did the testing?
    Steve

  7. #17
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    2,114
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by SteveL View Post
    Can you tell us which manufacturers did the testing?
    I doubt you'll get an answer from that, as paid for knowledge isn't normally public unless it can help sales. I would tend to agree with Grant on that what he has stated.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Tennessee
    Posts
    8,546
    Feedback Score
    0
    I know this is a thread about longevity, but I'd like to add something I experienced firsthand with a chromed and then nitride barrel.

    I had a S&W M&P15R, the 5.45x39 version. It originally came with a chrome lined barrel. I shot Wolf 60gr through it without issues. Decided to make it into a pistol so I bought another lower (to keep it legal going to a pistol) and cut down the chrome lined barrel to 11". Again no problems. Later I decided to make a training carbine out of it and bought a Ballistic Advantage melonited 14.5" barrel and extended FH for it. Then I started having failures-to-extract. A lot of FTE. Never remedied the problem and sold the upper and ammo to a guy with the admonition to liberally use a chamber brush while firing or it would FTE.

    Now, to be fair it could've been an out-of-spec chamber. Could've been the steel-cased Wolf (there is no brass-cased 5.45 that I know of). Or it could've been the Melonite. Not sure. I have an MR556 pistol that I had the barrel nitrided on. Granted, I'm using brass-cased NATO ammo but I've never had a FTE from it so far.

    I'm sure this muddies the water a bit but from my limited experience steel-cased ammo + nitriding doesn't do well.
    11C2P '83-'87
    Airborne Infantry

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    142
    Feedback Score
    4 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by dramabeats View Post
    Fact? I've actually read that they wear faster..
    They wear more slowly than non chrome lined, I have no idea of which one last longer, still just an FYI for me, as I will continue to use melonited barrels regardless of which one last longer.

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    166
    Feedback Score
    0
    Thanks for all the replies so far.

Page 2 of 7 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •