Howdy,
I tried this with my G20 back in 1993.
I thought it was a bad idea back then and still do.
Paul
P.S. Back in '93 there wasn't any conversion or aftermarket barrels.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Howdy,
I tried this with my G20 back in 1993.
I thought it was a bad idea back then and still do.
Paul
P.S. Back in '93 there wasn't any conversion or aftermarket barrels.
Folks should read an article all the way through before commenting on it.
1) The article is a first hand report of two shooters each running at least ten thousand rounds of 40 in an unmodified 10mm Glock without issue. It also has a second hand report of a third shooter doing the same
2) The extra leade reduces chamber pressure. It has the additional benefit of making the pressure curve less sharp and the 40 S&W has one of the sharpest pressure curves among pistol rounds
3) The article points out that the Glock firing pin has a physical block. It cannot over travel and cause primer piercings if the case is not held against the bolt face. The Glock extractor is large and strong enough to hold the case at against the bolt face
The one mistake the author makes is identifying excessive head space as a source of kabooms. Firing a 40 in 10mm chamber is the very definition of excessive head space
INSIDE PLAN OF BOX
- ROAD-RUNNER LIFTS GLASS OF WATER- PULLING UP MATCH
- MATCH SCRATCHES ON MATCH-BOX
- MATCH LIGHTS FUSE TO TNT
- BOOM!
- HA-HA!!
-WILE E. COYOTE, AUTHOR OF "EVERYTHING I NEEDED TO KNOW IN LIFE, I LEARNED FROM GOLDBERG & MURPHY"
I am American
The article was interesting. My concern is with people trying this in a S&W 1076 or another handgun based on the results with a Glock 20.
Has this experiment been conducted with any other 10mm pistol made by a different firearm manufacturer? Anyone who owns a 10mm other than a Glock want to try this?
Train 2 Win
The fact that the author states that he feels it's safer to shoot a .40 through the 10mm than it is to shoot a .40 through a .40 or a 10mm through a 10mm, then goes on to tell everyone NOT do it, makes him an idiot in my book.
He also states the rounds slide up the breach face & slip under the extractor, which I agree with... under normal conditions. The problem with that being with the .40 cases are quite a bit shorter than the 10mm. The cases can be shifted forward in the magazine thus not allowing a fluid transfer under the extractor. The feeding can be erratic & in some cases the extractor will snap over the rim if the cases are far enough forward in the mag. If you reload, the excessive wear on the rims isn't a good thing either.
I understand that hand cycling isn't a 1:1 comparison to live fire but grab your G20 & load it with .40 snap caps. You'll see what I mean.
I do agree that it works, as I've tried it first hand, but I still wouldn't make a habit out of it.
Howdy,
I was trying to figure out how to post a response without sounding like a jerk but that's just not my style.
Anywho.......
Gee, as a person that has been shooting 10mm for almost 30 years and has sent +30,000 rounds downrange, and has been shooting .40S&W for over 20 years and has sent +30,000 rounds downrange, has been reloading 10mm and .40S&W for over 20 years and have tried the .40S&W in a 10mm barrel trick I will have to call BULLSHITTE on the above mentioned stories.
I also feel sorry for anyone that is gullible enough to believe the above mentioned stories.
Paul
Stengun, you think the author is lying to us? You don't think he actually shoots 40 S&W through his 10mm Glock? You don't think I've got enough technical knowledge and experience under my belt to find the author's analysis plausible?
Just checking......
INSIDE PLAN OF BOX
- ROAD-RUNNER LIFTS GLASS OF WATER- PULLING UP MATCH
- MATCH SCRATCHES ON MATCH-BOX
- MATCH LIGHTS FUSE TO TNT
- BOOM!
- HA-HA!!
-WILE E. COYOTE, AUTHOR OF "EVERYTHING I NEEDED TO KNOW IN LIFE, I LEARNED FROM GOLDBERG & MURPHY"
I am American
So what kind of shooting are we doing?
I would thing that doing drills, and holster work would lead to a lot of malfunctions.
Unlike someone mentioned, I think most of the time the pickup rail (my word) would pick up the round and slide it under the extractor, I'd think you would have a lot of FTF because of the round working forward in the magazine and the steeper feed angles the shorter round would have as a result.
Does that seem plausible?
Bookmarks