Page 3 of 20 FirstFirst 1234513 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 193

Thread: How could we get suppressors off of the NFA?

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    1,048
    Feedback Score
    12 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Renegade View Post
    Exactly. If it was about money, MJ would have a $200 tax on it.
    Well...recreational marijuana is taxed different (higher) than medicinal. No registry for recreational use though.

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    3,234
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Flankenstein View Post
    Well...recreational marijuana is taxed different (higher) than medicinal. No registry for recreational use though.
    No Federal tax AFAIK.

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    1,048
    Feedback Score
    12 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Renegade View Post
    No Federal tax AFAIK.
    Federally illegal. I wouldn't use weed to articulate my point here.
    Last edited by Flankenstein; 09-25-15 at 19:49.

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    3
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Flankenstein View Post
    No, not that. It's about control, not money. They can print money, they can't print control.
    Makes sense. Disturbingly so.

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Midwest
    Posts
    5,159
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    I agree with others, never gonna happen.

    There's no way they'd put their cash cow on a diet. I also think that poking the issue is a good way to invoke a price hike.

    It's about control AND money. The ATF wants both.
    Quote Originally Posted by JSantoro View Post
    Stop dicking the dog, please. It's gross.

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    1,537
    Feedback Score
    16 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Ryno12 View Post
    I agree with others, never gonna happen.

    There's no way they'd put their cash cow on a diet. I also think that poking the issue is a good way to invoke a price hike.

    It's about control AND money. The ATF wants both.
    This ^^^ is so accurate.
    Politician's Prefer Unarmed Peasants

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    N.E. OH
    Posts
    7,616
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by themonk View Post
    The actual NFA law would have to be changed for it to happen = two houses of congress and the president would have to sign it.

    May be a can of worms to go there.
    Or an executive order. I'm a realist and I'm sick of "fighting clean". Rip their eyes out and bite their ears off. Executive order everything go get the country right, then burn the bridge so the next guy has as much power as he should.. very little.

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Las Vegas
    Posts
    756
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Ryno12 View Post
    I agree with others, never gonna happen.

    There's no way they'd put their cash cow on a diet. I also think that poking the issue is a good way to invoke a price hike.

    It's about control AND money. The ATF wants both.
    A one time tax one the point of sale? They would make more money as the volume would increase.

    Quote Originally Posted by MegademiC View Post
    Or an executive order. I'm a realist and I'm sick of "fighting clean". Rip their eyes out and bite their ears off. Executive order everything go get the country right, then burn the bridge so the next guy has as much power as he should.. very little.
    Thank you, I am sick of playing by the rule as the other side runs roughshot over us. **** them, lets win.

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    2,692
    Feedback Score
    40 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by MegademiC View Post
    Or an executive order. I'm a realist and I'm sick of "fighting clean". Rip their eyes out and bite their ears off. Executive order everything go get the country right, then burn the bridge so the next guy has as much power as he should.. very little.
    This doesn't solve the problem as when the next or subsequent executive comes into office they can change it back. The law needs to be changed.

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Homer, AK
    Posts
    123
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Clint View Post
    Easy, Just put OHSA in charge.

    They'll make suppressor use mandatory with a 10 year prison sentence for each cartridge discharged without a suppressor.

    Clever line of thinking, but I doubt the noise is the only thing they'd want to eliminate.

Page 3 of 20 FirstFirst 1234513 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •