http://law-policy.com/wp-content/upl...N-10192015.pdf
We hold that the core provisions of the New York and
21 Connecticut laws prohibiting possession of semiautomatic assault
22 weapons and large‐capacity magazines do not violate the Second
23 Amendment, and that the challenged individual provisions are not
24 void for vagueness. The particular provision of New York’s law
25 regulating load limits, however, does not survive the requisite
26 scrutiny. One further specific provision—Connecticut’s prohibition
27 on the non‐semiautomatic Remington 7615—unconstitutionally
28 infringes upon the Second Amendment right. Accordingly, we
29 AFFIRM in part the judgment of the District Court for the District of
30 Connecticut insofar as it upheld the prohibition of semiautomatic
31 assault weapons and large‐capacity magazines, and REVERSE in
32 part its holding with respect to the Remington 7615. With respect to
Bookmarks