Originally Posted by
Digital_Damage
Acog is fixed. and I'm guessing it is the common 3x variety, SBR can mean a lot of things. Using a 11.5-12 to try and reach 600m just does not make any sense to me. A 14.5 drop to 600m is 17.7 MOA. A 11.5 with 62g is a 175-200 fps drop at 10 yards, just estimating but at 600m that will be around a 22 moa drop.
The goal isn't a SBR to use at 600. It's to experiment and stretch my abilities. I want a compact rifle that can reach out when necessary. In F2S's class I used a .308 but I pulled out my 16" 5.56 AR with a Z6i 1-6 at the 600 yard line just to see how it would do and was easily getting hits. The 12" upper will lose velocity but I'm looking to see what I can do with it. And a 1-4 or 1-6 lets me use it up close as a RDS.
Originally Posted by
Failure2Stop
Big benefit with purpose built 22 optics is the close-range parallax adjustment.
I actually had a TA01 on my 15/22 for a while. No problem with clays at 100. Fit the intent.
I've been looking for a replacement, keep drifting back and forth between something like my primary and something more 22 specific.
From Tapatalk:
Jack Leuba
Knight's Armament Company: Military/Govt Product Liaison
F2S Consulting: Director of Shooting Stuff
Thanks. The parallax was the only reason I kept finding for rimfire vs centerfire optics. That's why I was looking at 1-4 and 1-6 glass. When I'm not using an Aimpont, I'm using my Z6i 1-6's. In your DMR class last year it worked great from contact to 600. When we shot at 1000 I was out of reticle and didn't have reference points to adjust for your spotting. Most often I use them like Aimpoints which is why I thought a variable with true 1x would be good for the 10/22.
Before you suggest that licensing, background checks, or other restrictions for the 2nd Amendment are reasonable... Apply those same ideas to the 1st and 4th Amendments. Then tell me how reasonable they are.
Bookmarks