|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Banned
Couldn't find a super-appropriate sub-forum for the topic, but this was my best bet. After reading Chris Kyle's book I'm inclined to say bolt-action rifles, but I would also assume that M4/M16s see a lot more action, as well as belt-feds. Is there any statistical information for current conflicts with dead combatants categorized by weapon used?
Senior Member
Why??
Senior Member
My guess? Call of Duty gamer.Originally Posted by ColtSeavers
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Support the NRA
Member
The M16/M4. I doubt the perpetuity of the M2 would be enough to match such a long lasted general service rifle as the M16 and M4.
What the hell compelled you to ask such a thing?
Nobody ever got shot climbing over the wall into East Berlin.
Delivering the most precision possible, at the greatest distance possible, with the highest rate of fire possible.
Senior Member
I'll play. What about the M1 variants?
98% Sarcastic. 100% Overthinking things and making up reasons for buying a new firearm.
Senior Member
I would say the field radio takes credit for the highest number of enemy casualties.
Last edited by T2C; 11-17-15 at 16:45.
Train 2 Win
Banned
Cool, thanks for jumping on this the wrong way everyone. I was asking because I'm interested in statistical evidence and thought it may shed some light on the usefulness of different calibers or platforms. I'm sure that somewhere this is documented, is it really a crime to be curious about which of our infantry small arms are the most effective on paper?
Posting Permissions
Bookmarks