Fire Mission. Defund ATF-41P. It's coming.

[bamackc]

Last night I joined ASA, American Suppressor Association.

Now to contact my Reps.

There is absolutely no reason for each person on the trust to be photographed and fingerprinted for suppressor purchases.

[Auto-X Fil]

I want the whole NFA revoked, but I wonder if it would be an acceptable compromise to disallow trusts, but remove SBRs/SBSs/suppressors and just leave the NFA for FA/DD/AOW.

[SC-Texas]

That makes no sense. Why disallow trusts but not corps?

Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk

[BigWaylon]

I doubt there's any "acceptable compromise" to the other side. If yours was proposed, AOWs would definitely need to shift over with suppressors. AOWs currently get grouped with cans in regards to not needing a signature on an F4, or requiring a 5320.20 for interstate transport. I just wish they'd use the $5 transfers with cans.

Although I'd disagree with it, I could see MG/DD being more strictly regulated.

[glocktogo]

I doubt there's any "acceptable compromise" to the other side. If yours was proposed, AOWs would definitely need to shift over with suppressors. AOWs currently get grouped with cans in regards to not needing a signature on an F4, or requiring a 5320.20 for interstate transport. I just wish they'd use the $5 transfers with cans.

Although I'd disagree with it, I could see MG/DD being more strictly regulated.

I'd have no problem with full BG checks on all trustees and corp. officers who can possess without the primary holder present. So long as the $200 per item fee isn't raised that is. What I really want to see is the need for trusts and corps. eliminated. All it would take is a funding bill with a rider requiring any BATFE office to conduct the check and sign-off if the local CLEO refuses. The U.S. gov't. can't force CLEO's to sign, so they shouldn't be allowed to hide behind them as a reason to not approve either. After all, if they don't know whether an NFA item is prohibited by law in that state, they're too stupid to be regulating them in the 1st place.

Oh, and +1 for OTC Suppressors, SBR & SBS.

[wilson1911]

How come removal of silencers was not added to the omnibus that was just signed ?

[jpmuscle]

How come removal of silencers was not added to the omnibus that was just signed ?

Because they hate us, the people?

Sent from my XT1060 using Tapatalk

[bamackc]

How come removal of silencers was not added to the omnibus that was just signed ?

Because EVERY PRO-GUN rider was taken out. THANKS REPUBLICAN HOUSE AND SPEAKER RYAN!

[Chorizo]

Because EVERY PRO-GUN rider was taken out. THANKS REPUBLICAN HOUSE AND SPEAKER RYAN!

Not completely true.

http://www.ammoland.com/2014/01/the-...n-or-anti-gun/

[SC-Texas]

I'd have no problem with full BG checks on all trustees and corp. officers who can possess without the primary holder present. So long as the $200 per item fee isn't raised that is. . . . . .

Seriously? True colors showing

Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk