As I consider purchase of a riser for a Primary Arms Advanced Micro Dot RDS, the question arises... co-witness or lower 1/3 co-witness?
Thus, I am here, once again, to consult the (collective) Oracle. So, what are your thoughts?
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
As I consider purchase of a riser for a Primary Arms Advanced Micro Dot RDS, the question arises... co-witness or lower 1/3 co-witness?
Thus, I am here, once again, to consult the (collective) Oracle. So, what are your thoughts?
Personal preference based upon cheekweld and BUIS through the optic. I like 1/3 but YMMV.
Tomac
"His Universe, His rules." - Tomac
It's preference, but I do think rifle requirements should play some role in consideration.
I use fixed irons and a lower-1/3rd co-witness, QD mount on my HD rifle. If the dot dies for whatever reason, I can either use my irons immediately, or if I've got time, take the dot off. Also, I tend to treat my rifles as irons-first, and a red dot needs to be set up so that I can go back to irons immediately. I do the same with AK's... lower-1/3rd co-witness, and a QD mount.
Absolute with fixed irons can be cluttered, but if you've got flip-ups, it is more about cheek weld. There's a minimal, but noticeable, difference in cheek weld between absolute and lower-1/3rd. If you're running with a fixed mount, make sure you re-zero your irons through the glass. If you're going QD, zero without the glass in between. The glass can distort your sight picture.
"I don't collect guns anymore, I stockpile weapons for ****ing war." Chuck P.
"Some days you eat the bacon, and other days the bacon eats you." SeriousStudent
"Don't complain when after killing scores of women and children in a mall, a group of well armed men who train to shoot people like you in the face show up to say hello." WillBrink
I prefer lower 1/3. The iron sights obstruct less of the view through the optic.
Train 2 Win
I prefer is a lower 1/3 mount with fixed front and rear irons. I learned to shoot with irons so I instinctively want to get the nose to charging handle cheek weld every time, now all I do is bring my head up just slightly for the red dot or down for just the irons.
Experience has slowly taught me that a greater clear field of view is better in practically any situation. Lower 1/3.
Nobody ever got shot climbing over the wall into East Berlin.
Delivering the most precision possible, at the greatest distance possible, with the highest rate of fire possible.
Just like everyone else so far, I prefer lower 1/3. Less clutter when looking through the optic is a good thing.
Lower 1/3. More forgiving of head position, less fatiguing when shooting a lot.
With a lower 1/3, the red dot sits higher, correct? If so, would like that, as I find the iron BU sights seem low on the rifle to me and I have to scrunch my head lower on the butt stock than I would prefer with the irons. If the red dot sits higher, I wouldn't have to scrunch my head down so low on the stock.
Bookmarks