Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 43

Thread: RDS: Co-Witness or Lower 1/3 Co-Witness... your thoughts?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Sonoran Desert-Arizona
    Posts
    713
    Feedback Score
    0

    RDS: Co-Witness or Lower 1/3 Co-Witness... your thoughts?

    As I consider purchase of a riser for a Primary Arms Advanced Micro Dot RDS, the question arises... co-witness or lower 1/3 co-witness?

    Thus, I am here, once again, to consult the (collective) Oracle. So, what are your thoughts?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    641
    Feedback Score
    25 (100%)
    Personal preference based upon cheekweld and BUIS through the optic. I like 1/3 but YMMV.
    Tomac
    "His Universe, His rules." - Tomac

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    1,141
    Feedback Score
    18 (100%)
    It's preference, but I do think rifle requirements should play some role in consideration.

    I use fixed irons and a lower-1/3rd co-witness, QD mount on my HD rifle. If the dot dies for whatever reason, I can either use my irons immediately, or if I've got time, take the dot off. Also, I tend to treat my rifles as irons-first, and a red dot needs to be set up so that I can go back to irons immediately. I do the same with AK's... lower-1/3rd co-witness, and a QD mount.

    Absolute with fixed irons can be cluttered, but if you've got flip-ups, it is more about cheek weld. There's a minimal, but noticeable, difference in cheek weld between absolute and lower-1/3rd. If you're running with a fixed mount, make sure you re-zero your irons through the glass. If you're going QD, zero without the glass in between. The glass can distort your sight picture.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Hamburg PA
    Posts
    3,506
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Tomac View Post
    Personal preference based upon cheekweld and BUIS through the optic. I like 1/3 but YMMV.
    Tomac
    I kind of have to agree here. It is preference. Have used both, I have my preferences to 1/3, but I know others who prefer absolute. Try both if you can and see what you like the most.
    "I don't collect guns anymore, I stockpile weapons for ****ing war." Chuck P.

    "Some days you eat the bacon, and other days the bacon eats you." SeriousStudent

    "Don't complain when after killing scores of women and children in a mall, a group of well armed men who train to shoot people like you in the face show up to say hello." WillBrink

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    CONUS
    Posts
    5,180
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    I prefer lower 1/3. The iron sights obstruct less of the view through the optic.
    Train 2 Win

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    77
    Feedback Score
    0
    I prefer is a lower 1/3 mount with fixed front and rear irons. I learned to shoot with irons so I instinctively want to get the nose to charging handle cheek weld every time, now all I do is bring my head up just slightly for the red dot or down for just the irons.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Washington State
    Posts
    545
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Experience has slowly taught me that a greater clear field of view is better in practically any situation. Lower 1/3.
    Nobody ever got shot climbing over the wall into East Berlin.

    Delivering the most precision possible, at the greatest distance possible, with the highest rate of fire possible.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Posts
    402
    Feedback Score
    202 (100%)
    Just like everyone else so far, I prefer lower 1/3. Less clutter when looking through the optic is a good thing.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    South Texas
    Posts
    2,740
    Feedback Score
    52 (98%)
    Lower 1/3. More forgiving of head position, less fatiguing when shooting a lot.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Sonoran Desert-Arizona
    Posts
    713
    Feedback Score
    0
    With a lower 1/3, the red dot sits higher, correct? If so, would like that, as I find the iron BU sights seem low on the rifle to me and I have to scrunch my head lower on the butt stock than I would prefer with the irons. If the red dot sits higher, I wouldn't have to scrunch my head down so low on the stock.

Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •