Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Builds- Mags

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    2
    Feedback Score
    0

    Builds- Mags

    I have a 2 questions:

    I thought if you build an AR rifle from parts you could not sale it as a complete rifle, that you could only sale as parts.

    Second, I live in Texas but do not have a CHL, can I load my RIFLE mags at home and transport them to the range loaded, not with a mag in the rifle just pre-load my mags.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    VA/OH
    Posts
    29,631
    Feedback Score
    33 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by peanutmanswa
    I have a 2 questions:

    I thought if you build an AR rifle from parts you could not sale it as a complete rifle, that you could only sale as parts.

    Second, I live in Texas but do not have a CHL, can I load my RIFLE mags at home and transport them to the range loaded, not with a mag in the rifle just pre-load my mags.

    A lower receiver is the ONLY part that is restricted. If you buy a lower and then add an upper to it (making a complete weapon) you can sell it however you like.

    As far as transporting loaded mags with a weapon in the same vehicle, that might not be a good idea (depends on your State). Your best bet is to always keep the weapon and ammo seperate and just load mags when you get to the range.


    C4

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Southern Indiana
    Posts
    1,890
    Feedback Score
    14 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by C4IGrant
    A lower receiver is the ONLY part that is restricted. If you buy a lower and then add an upper to it (making a complete weapon) you can sell it however you like.
    Isn't there an 11% federal excise tax that has to be collected and paid to Treasury on sale of the now complete rifle? Or is that "infringing"?
    "The very purpose of a Bill of Rights was to withdraw certain subjects from the vicissitudes of political controversy, to place them beyond the reach of majorities and officials and to establish them as legal principles to be applied by the courts." Justice Robert Jackson, WV St. Board of Education v. Barnette, 319 U.S. 624 (1943)

    "I don’t care how many pull ups and sit ups you can do. I care that you can move yourself across the ground with a fighting load and engage the enemy." Max Velocity

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    VA/OH
    Posts
    29,631
    Feedback Score
    33 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Submariner
    Isn't there an 11% federal excise tax that has to be collected and paid to Treasury on sale of the now complete rifle? Or is that "infringing"?

    The person that pushes the pins in (the first time) is responsible for paying the 11% FET. I am about 100% certain that most nobody does this.


    C4

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    OK
    Posts
    2,383
    Feedback Score
    11 (100%)
    Disclaimer: I say this more as a question, not as a statement of fact, but...


    Wouldn't the problems with resale only crop up if you had machined the lower yourself, from one of those 80% forgings?
    --Josh H.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    537
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by C4IGrant
    The person that pushes the pins in (the first time) is responsible for paying the 11% FET. I am about 100% certain that most nobody does this.


    C4
    But isn't that just for a "manufacturer" and not you average Joe who puts together a rifle, decides he doesn't like it and the sells it ?

    Mike

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Southern Indiana
    Posts
    1,890
    Feedback Score
    14 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by C4IGrant
    The person that pushes the pins in (the first time) is responsible for paying the 11% FET. I am about 100% certain that most nobody does this.

    C4
    Personal Use. FAET does not attach in cases where a manufacturer, importer or producer incidentally manufactures, produces or imports a taxable article for personal use. See 27 CFR Section 53.112(b).
    "The very purpose of a Bill of Rights was to withdraw certain subjects from the vicissitudes of political controversy, to place them beyond the reach of majorities and officials and to establish them as legal principles to be applied by the courts." Justice Robert Jackson, WV St. Board of Education v. Barnette, 319 U.S. 624 (1943)

    "I don’t care how many pull ups and sit ups you can do. I care that you can move yourself across the ground with a fighting load and engage the enemy." Max Velocity

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •