Page 18 of 18 FirstFirst ... 8161718
Results 171 to 178 of 178

Thread: Warsport vs SR15

  1. #171
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    2,348
    Feedback Score
    48 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by patriot_man View Post
    While many discount the Warsport as a just a pretty rifle I've heard the Warsport has been tested by a SMU.

    Not sure if there is any truth behind this but it would be pretty with a track record?
    Means two things:

    Jack and Shit
    "People have always been stupid. The Internet just makes it easier for us to know about them." - donlapalma

  2. #172
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Durham, NC
    Posts
    4,280
    Feedback Score
    22 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Koshinn View Post
    I don't know if I can name a single AR company that isn't "used by a SMU" or "endorsed by a tier 1 operator" or something similar.

    Unless there is hard proof, it means nothing. And even if there is hard proof of use, it doesn't necessarily mean anything.
    You know that area (probably). There are several "boutique" AR manufacturers in central NC, close to Bragg, and it's not unheard of that some of these ARs end up at the range there. You know how it goes..."hey, would you mind shooting this?" goes to "used by a Tier 1 unit."

  3. #173
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    2,056
    Feedback Score
    5 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by patriot_man View Post
    While many discount the Warsport as a just a pretty rifle I've heard the Warsport has been tested by a SMU.

    Not sure if there is any truth behind this but it would be pretty with a track record?
    Yawn… Great they 'tested' it. What matters is the result they had. Did they find it to be total crap or was it the most uberest of rifles they had ever had the privilege of touching? With out results who cares, you statement is utterly meaningless and with out merit.

  4. #174
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    942
    Feedback Score
    0
    I believe there is a legit guy that likes them, but can a standard parts gun be any better than bcm or daniel defense.... or rainier, etc, etc, etc

  5. #175
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    GA
    Posts
    3,704
    Feedback Score
    43 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by JG007 View Post
    I believe there is a legit guy that likes them, but can a standard parts gun be any better than bcm or daniel defense.... or rainier, etc, etc, etc
    Warsport has alluded for quite a long while that they designed the guns to fit a specific mission profile for an SMU. But when asked for more specific information the response was always along the lines of "can't say anything else. Because, secret squirrel stuff." It's a load of horse crap. They may have given some guns to guys at Bragg to play around with and some of those guys may like the guns, but there's nothing special about the LVOA. It's no different than guys endorsing Salient. And we all know that Salient guns are dressed up, over priced, average guns.

    There was a time when Noveske really did offer some things that others didn't. But that was 10 years ago. These days, BCM and Sionics offer the best quality for the money. And if you're going to spend more than that, the KAC SR15 is the only gun that offers significant design improvements that would justify the added expense.

  6. #176
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    942
    Feedback Score
    0
    I saw one verified guy post a pic of his personal gun, war sport

    And I'd agree, but you could include lmt, maybe vltor or even some piston guns in the list of innovators


    Definitely don't understand kac prices for guns that can't be better than bcm/sionics/etc


    I still want a kac but honestly probably aren't good enough to notice the difference

  7. #177
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    2,348
    Feedback Score
    48 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by JG007 View Post
    I saw one verified guy post a pic of his personal gun, war sport

    And I'd agree, but you could include lmt, maybe vltor or even some piston guns in the list of innovators


    Definitely don't understand kac prices for guns that can't be better than bcm/sionics/etc


    I still want a kac but honestly probably aren't good enough to notice the difference
    You're paying for R&D and everything the rifle comes standard with that guys pay to upgrade to. The intermediate length gas system, improved Mod 2 gas block, E3 bolt and the full ambi lower receiver alone are signifiant improvements over standard carbines and mid-length rifles. When you add it all up you arrive at the price point of a KAC. Just a question, but have you ever shot a KAC rifle?
    "People have always been stupid. The Internet just makes it easier for us to know about them." - donlapalma

  8. #178
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    942
    Feedback Score
    0
    Clarifying, I don't get companies asking the same price as a KAC when they only offer a basic parts assembled gun that would appear to offer nothing more than a bcm, colt, DD.

Page 18 of 18 FirstFirst ... 8161718

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •