Gary Johnson polling at 15% (was 13%)

Originally Posted by 26 Inf

If you Anglo cucks can't handle the truth, I'm not going to stop speaking it You have an unwarranted arrogance. At this point I believe that you are a guest of all us 'Anglo cucks.' Maybe you should keep that in mind, as a good guest would.

Because, you know, fvcked up politics and all aside, there was a reason that whenever you left whatever backwards nation you came from you chose to land here. So, you know, you are welcome.

I do believe that you would probably be eligible to join the Armed Forces of the United States if you are here legally. In my view, that would be a better way of repaying our hospitality than the course you are currently on.

As far as GQ goes, did you read where I wrote 'disclaimer - it is GQ, and I didn't write it.'

Damn. Well said. That is one of the best internet takedowns I've ever seen.

Originally Posted by Sensei

Hmm, I'm not saying that she is an alternative to be trusted. Nothing of what I posted suggested that she is an alternative.

The fact that 50+% of the country's assholes (to use your term) plan to support one of these corrupt individuals is not something that I worry about.

No, if someone is hitting the lever for The Cunt they are an asshole, and I stand by that. I didn't say you were doing so. But you suggest that (apparently) in their eyes she IS a viable alternative. How they see that is beyond me. They both suck but she sucks FAR FAR worse.

Originally Posted by Sensei

Damn. Well said. That is one of the best internet takedowns I've ever seen.

Yeah, I liked that too.

On one side we have all the people who are utterly fed up with politics as usual in this country and aren't afraid to say it!

On the other side we have all the people who lost the primary. Their current defense is to align with the ultraliberal, metrosexual/effeminate publication GQ and are allowing them to frame the current backhanded insult, which is directed at the alleged Freudian mental state they believe us to suffer from.

Excuse me while I openly laugh at your pathetic excuse for a counter argument, because we really don't care what you or "Gentleman's Quarterly" think about us. Feel free to regroup and try again! We'll be here waiting!

Originally Posted by ABNAK

While I agree Trump is his own worst enemy, how can you say with a straight face (or the 50+% of the assholes who will do it) that The Cunt is a viable alternative to be trusted? Really?

Of course not. Who claimed that? Hence the OP and content of this thread. Hint, it's not about HC. Two, those who simply admit Trump is a flip flopping opportunist buffoon who does not give a damn about anything but Trump, you'll vote for him simply due to not being HC garner more validity than anyone actually attempting to defend him as remotely qualified for selectman, much less POTUS.

Originally Posted by Benito

Considering that I am not coming from a hostile culture, not one that takes shits in the street, nor one that cannot function without the $$$ from white guilt ridden Anglos flowing in, it's not really an issue.

And hey, don't shoot the messenger. If you Anglo cucks can't handle the truth, I'm not going to stop speaking it. The Anglosohere has had much less contact with Islam than where I come from, so perhaps you should learn from the experience of others rather than suffer unnecessarily.

Yeah, GQ. Cucks complaining about an apt description of cucks.

The thread about why you plan to vote for Trump ==> https://www.m4carbine.net/showthread...ting-for-Trump

Note, I'm not wsting time attempting to talk people out of voting for him or insulting people who don't agree with me in that thread. You support Trump. That's your thread.

This thread is for those interested in what may be a viable alternative and see Trump as 0.0001% the lesser of two evils here.

Please go.

Originally Posted by Falar

****ing. Spot. On.

I don't trust him any more than the Beast.

Why would you? He's given us no reason what so ever to do so. It's simply that he's now decided to take advantage of a specific segment of the population who is rightlfully pissed off and he's simply appealing to what ever it is he thinks they want to hear. If that had always been is song, I'd be more interested, but I simply can't swallow the Koolaid and ignore what we know of him

Originally Posted by 26 Inf

If you Anglo cucks can't handle the truth, I'm not going to stop speaking it You have an unwarranted arrogance. At this point I believe that you are a guest of all us 'Anglo cucks.' Maybe you should keep that in mind, as a good guest would.

Because, you know, fvcked up politics and all aside, there was a reason that whenever you left whatever backwards nation you came from you chose to land here. So, you know, you are welcome.

I do believe that you would probably be eligible to join the Armed Forces of the United States if you are here legally. In my view, that would be a better way of repaying our hospitality than the course you are currently on.

As far as GQ goes, did you read where I wrote 'disclaimer - it is GQ, and I didn't write it.'

Mic drop/End.

Originally Posted by ABNAK

No, if someone is hitting the lever for The Cunt they are an asshole, and I stand by that. I didn't say you were doing so. But you suggest that (apparently) in their eyes she IS a viable alternative. How they see that is beyond me. They both suck but she sucks FAR FAR worse.

I don't follow. You indicated as many have a vote for GJ was a vote for HC, when Sensei showed that's demonstrably false and votes are taken from HC mostly it appears. Hence, more people seeing they have an alternative to HC appear to be leaning toward GJ, which favors Trump. So, these people don't see HC as a choice, but apparently don't see Trump as a viable alternative.

This thread exists for those who see GJ as the lesser of three evils, and given the chance, would choose GJ and or are still on the fence.

Originally Posted by WillBrink

[I]
I don't follow. You indicated as many have a vote for GJ was a vote for HC, when Sensei showed that's demonstrably false and votes are taken from HC mostly it appears. Hence, more people seeing they have an alternative to HC appear to be leaning toward GJ, which favors Trump. So, these people don't see HC as a choice, but apparently don't see Trump as a viable alternative.

This thread exists for those who see GJ as the lesser of three evils, and given the chance, would choose GJ and or are still on the fence.

You got me wrong. I never said a vote for GJ was a vote for HC. I don't believe that. I also stated several times in other threads that if it had been a RINO (Rubio/Kasich/Bush/Christie) that I would be singing the "Anyone but the RINO" song myself. Trump isn't an Establishment RINO and that's the ONLY reason I'm voting for him. I don't particularly like Trump, although some of what he stands for I like. I will vote for him. That said, you've not seen me criticize someone for voting for GJ. The comment about another Perot giving another Clinton the Presidency was basically disgust with what I see as the writing on the wall and who is probably going to be our next POTUS. God help us.

Originally Posted by ABNAK

You got me wrong. I never said a vote for GJ was a vote for HC. I don't believe that. I also stated several times in other threads that if it had been a RINO (Rubio/Kasich/Bush/Christie) that I would be singing the "Anyone but the RINO" song myself. Trump isn't an Establishment RINO and that's the ONLY reason I'm voting for him. I don't particularly like Trump, although some of what he stands for I like. I will vote for him. That said, you've not seen me criticize someone for voting for GJ. The comment about another Perot giving another Clinton the Presidency was basically disgust with what I see as the writing on the wall and who is probably going to be our next POTUS. God help us.

Rgr rgr. I think we can both agree if the person who is probably going to be our next POTUS succeeds, the GOP has no one to blame but the GOP, per the last election where Obama was re elected with some of the lowest approval ratings ever. It was the GOPs for the taking, and they gave us Romney. Very few, including the majority in her own party, like HC, and it couldn't have been handed to the GOP on a platter any better if they tried. Yet, they still found a way to fu%$ it up by being more interested in maintaining their power and allowing Trump to fill the vacuum.

That's my take at least. Your mileage may vary.

I was Interested in Gary Johnson until I found out he SUPPORTS the TPP. So much for being a Libertarian. Tells me he is Either Ignorant or Bought Off. If you don't know what the TPP is and who really Wrote and Advocates it, do your research. I'm not going to explain it. IF you think NAFTA sucked, you haven't seen anything yet.

Originally Posted by 26 Inf

If you Anglo cucks can't handle the truth, I'm not going to stop speaking it You have an unwarranted arrogance. At this point I believe that you are a guest of all us 'Anglo cucks.' Maybe you should keep that in mind, as a good guest would.

Because, you know, fvcked up politics and all aside, there was a reason that whenever you left whatever backwards nation you came from you chose to land here. So, you know, you are welcome.

I do believe that you would probably be eligible to join the Armed Forces of the United States if you are here legally. In my view, that would be a better way of repaying our hospitality than the course you are currently on.

As far as GQ goes, did you read where I wrote 'disclaimer - it is GQ, and I didn't write it.'

1) I am grateful. I never said I wasn't. That doesn't change the fact that a shocking amount of immigrants aren't really grateful, even just counting economic opportunity.
2) One of the points I made was that the place I came from was not nearly as ass backwards as where the majority of immigrants to America come from. Being white and non-Muslim is highly correlated with this. This is called a clue.
3) If you think I would join an armed forces that is led by a socialist islamophile (and likely Muslim) commander in chief, or for that matter any of the other cuck-led Western nations, you are sorely mistaken. Maybe if the military were used to win wars for America rather than create photo ops for the Leftist press, then we'd be talking.
4) Not all Anglos are cucks. I never said this. But most cucks are Anglos. People voting for Trump are not cucks, and have simply gotten fed up with compromising with the Left. Now I know it makes you feel good to call me a know-it-all foreigner, but there are plenty of American-born Anglo whites saying the same thing.

Anyways, the thread is about a lame losertarian. If he takes votes away from Hitlery, I'm all for it. If he takes votes away from Trump, you can enjoy life in Saudi/Clinton's America, disarmed and swarmed. Better start memorizing the Koran.

Originally Posted by Cagemonkey

I was Interested in Gary Johnson until I found out he SUPPORTS the TPP. So much for being a Libertarian. Tells me he is Either Ignorant or Bought Off. If you don't know what the TPP is and who really Wrote and Advocates it, do your research. I'm not going to explain it. IF you think NAFTA sucked, you haven't seen anything yet.

He's not a big L Libertarian by any means. He's a left of center GOP with some Libertarian leanings running on the Libertarian ticket, which is why the "true" big L Libertarians are not happy with him

His support for the TPP is lukewarm at best:

“It is my understanding that the TPP does advance free trade,” says Johnson, “Is it a perfect document? Probably not. But based on my understanding of the document, I would be supporting it [though] in a perfect world there wouldn’t be a document like that, there would just be free trade.”

I don't have enough objective unbiased sources to read to have a strong opinion on it. What I have read has been biased hyperbole. Regardless...

There would be zero people for me to vote for if I needed to agree with 100% of their positions on topics. I'd still have more faith in GJ to do the right thing before I would the two major candidates, that's for sure.