Gary Johnson polling at 15% (was 13%)

Thread: Gary Johnson polling at 15% (was 13%)

Tags:

  1. KTR03's Avatar

    KTR03 said: 09-05-16 22:26
    Quote Originally Posted by Benito View Post
    Truly pathetic. It's actually quite funny.
    Yet another globalist posing as being interested in human freedom.



    I would vote for Hitler, Mao, Stalin, Pol Pot and Satan before Hillary.
    I was wondering when the political rhetoric would jump the shark. You win the most ridiculous political post of an incrediblely ridiculous season. Have you ever stood in a concentration camp? Have you seen the stacks of Cambodian skulls, the starvation caused by Mao and Stalin? Seen the gulags? It is totally fine to think Hilary is a corrupt, incompetent candidate but to equate prefer Stalin or Hitler is just silly. Words matter.
    Damien

    If a large number of people are willing to kill you for saying something, then it probably really needs to be said. .

  2. HKGuns's Avatar

    HKGuns said: 09-05-16 22:32
    Quote Originally Posted by FromMyColdDeadHand View Post
    These third party candidates are a sign that the system normally operating with two parties is not working right.
    You are apparently too young to remember Ross Perot, the man responsible for her husbands time in the Whitehouse.

    3rd party candidates have been around for years and are nothing exceptional today.

  3. MountainRaven's Avatar

    MountainRaven said: 09-05-16 23:21
    The system was never intended to have political parties, let alone two political parties that dominate national politics ad æternum.
    " Nil desperandum - Never Despair. That is a motto for you and me. All are not dead; and where there is a spark of patriotic fire, we will rekindle it. "
    - Samuel Adams -

  4. SteyrAUG's Avatar

    SteyrAUG said: 09-06-16 00:12
    Quote Originally Posted by Fjallhrafn View Post
    No one even remotely believes that they'd rather have Hitler, Mao, Stalin, Pol Pot, or whoever for president.

    You know how evil Hitler, et al. were, right? And you'd totally kill them to keep them from taking power, right? Save millions of lives from destruction, keep from steering half of Europe into a half-century long hell, right?

    So how many of you are going to kill Hillary to keep her - the worst human being to seek power since Hitler, Stalin, and friends - from taking control of the most powerful country on earth?

    I'm hearing crickets.
    Hitler gave Germany the autobahn and the volkswagen. His government gave the world the assault rifle, ICBM and jet fighter. I believe if Clinton was made absolute dictator, she'd run his body count into the ground and her government would produce little or nothing of merit.

    While it happened on her husband's watch, Waco burned to the ground, a group of mostly Rangers was left to fend for themselves as they fought a hostile city with twice the population of Los Angeles, hard drives from Los Alamos were sold to China, we got a 10 "feature ban" on firearms and Hillary herself tried to push through socialized health care. So while it's hard to top a 10 million body county without absolute dictator powers and a mostly compliant population, I think she'd make us at least do the math to remind ourselves how bad things actually are.

    While I have little concern for middle eastern populations that mostly would enjoy seeing us dead, I do have to wonder what exactly is the body count Obama has managed to rack up in his reignited Cold war with Russia that is being waged in ISIS country.
    It's hard to be a ACLU hating, philosophically Libertarian, socially liberal, fiscally conservative, scientifically grounded, agnostic, porn admiring gun owner who believes in self determination.

    Chuck, we miss ya man.

    كافر

  5.  tb-av said: 09-06-16 00:27
    Quote Originally Posted by Fjallhrafn View Post
    The system was never intended to have political parties, .... [/I].
    There it is.

  6. Benito said: 09-06-16 22:30
    I stand by my hyperbole.
    At least if you elected Hitler/Mao/Pol Pot, your enemies would respect/fear you. With Hillary, the enemy would rejoice.

  7. skywalkrNCSU's Avatar

    skywalkrNCSU said: 09-06-16 22:46
    Quote Originally Posted by Benito View Post
    I stand by my hyperbole.
    At least if you elected Hitler/Mao/Pol Pot, your enemies would respect/fear you. With Hillary, the enemy would rejoice.
    Yeah at least they would fear you, forget all the atrocities and mass murders. This has to be the biggest jump the shark moment in political discussion.

  8. MountainRaven's Avatar

    MountainRaven said: 09-06-16 23:23
    I think Mussolini's tomb is missing its guardian.
    " Nil desperandum - Never Despair. That is a motto for you and me. All are not dead; and where there is a spark of patriotic fire, we will rekindle it. "
    - Samuel Adams -

  9. Sensei's Avatar

    Sensei said: 09-07-16 09:17
    Quote Originally Posted by Fjallhrafn View Post
    I think Mussolini's tomb is missing its guardian.
    The biggest reason NOT to support Trump is his core of supporters. I'm not talking about the reluctant, hold your nose, supporters. I'm talking about the hard core, primary supporters who excuse all of the missteps and gaffs.

    I think that I've heard enough. Time to grow the ignore list.
    I like my rifles like my women - short, light, fast, brown, and suppressed.

  10. HKGuns's Avatar

    HKGuns said: 09-07-16 10:08
    Quote Originally Posted by Sensei View Post
    The biggest reason NOT to support Trump is his core of supporters. I'm not talking about the reluctant, hold your nose, supporters. I'm talking about the hard core, primary supporters who excuse all of the missteps and gaffs.

    I think that I've heard enough. Time to grow the ignore list.
    Because Obama was smooth and he's been so good for the Country.

    Form over substance. Please.