Well, the M256 is a smooth bore tube, so it is of no particular problem to machine them oversized to accommodate the additional thickness of chromium. Since nitriding adds no additional thickness, there is no reason to remove the nitrided surface in order to plate it.
As to why they don't use it I cannot give an answer, other than to offer these two choices, 1) all the major caliber gun manufacturers, BAe North America (formerly United Defense), General Dynamics (Saco), Alliant, Mesa and Watervliet Arsenal as well as all the small caliber barrel manufactures like Colt and FN are complete idiots; all willing to spend millions of dollars since the late 1970 on things like explosive tantalum cladding or plasma spray as alternatives instead of a relatively inexpensive and simple plating over nitride, or 2) there is some technical reason why it is not worth the effort. You can pick your favorite.
There are many reports on how to increase barrel life published by the USG out there free for the reading, there are also as many more that are not released to the public.
Bookmarks