Originally Posted by
WillBrink
Older I get, more I know, less impressed I am by latest greatest super steel of the week. Other than rust and corrosion resistance, good carbon steel will taking a beating like nothing else it seems and when you can buy say 3-5 knives for the price of one knife is latest super steel, really hard to justify. Many of the super steels sensitive to a perfect HT, where as 1070, not so much. Interesting to note people were breaking Reeves fixed blade knives regularly, and that was blamed on the HT. Reeves claimed they were intentionally soft for easier sharpening in the field, and I will not claim to know the answers. I do know under hard field use people were snapping their expensive Reeves blades, and were not impressed. Read about that on the Blade Forums and such when I was paying attention to such things. Many feel the S35VN sub par to the S30V, and they (supposedly) went to S35VN because it was less damaging to their equipment vs inherently superior. My point being, not to bash Reeves per se, but to point out just seems the one thing you can't test if it's done right in some expensive super steel knife you purchased is that HT, so choosing steels less sensitive to needing perfect HT, makes some sense to me.
I still think D2 is perhaps best of the lot $ for performance and known HT...
Bookmarks