I've never messed around with a Hodge or Mega wedge lock rail, but I can attest to the rigidity of the Geissele MK8 and DD RIS II. You can't go wrong with either.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
I've never messed around with a Hodge or Mega wedge lock rail, but I can attest to the rigidity of the Geissele MK8 and DD RIS II. You can't go wrong with either.
"I don't just want gun rights... I want individual liberty, a culture of self-reliance....I want the whole bloody thing." - Kim du Toit
TonRitz I didn't see that thread. Thanks.
If you aren't armed when you take a dump in your own home then your opinion on what is a practical daily carry weapon isn't interesting to me.
The Geissele is supposedly one of the very few handguards designed for deflection issues when using MFALs.
Talk about the Geissele starts at 2:10.
In theory, I would think the URX 4 also has minimal deflection, due to the integrated barrel nut.
Griffen Armament also makes a handguard that they claim was designed for minimal deflection, though who knows how true their claims are.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ht5BpvOJl8c
https://www.griffinarmament.com/category-s/1861.htm
Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose.
老僧三十年前未參禪時、見山是山、見水是水、及至後夾親見知識、有箇入處、見山不是山、見水不是水、而今得箇體歇處、依然見山秪是山、見水秪是水。
https://www.instagram.com/defaultmp3/
I went to change my SLR rail on one of my ARs and I thought I was going to have to beat it off. I had to put a strap wrench on it and work it back and forth to get it to start moving. I originally had questions about it but they were all answered when I went to remove one. I have no doubts about it now. All my junk has SLR rails.
Filter out all the "f***s" and white noise and there's about 30 good seconds on the geissele rail.
Can one of you guys who is close to or claim to have "friends" in Geissele tell them to put the rail debate to bed and make a proprietary tongue and groove upper/rail a la the 416 SMR and be done with it.
I have a pretty good faith that my URX 4 isn't going anywhere, seeing as it's also the barrel nut. You don't see too many properly torqued barrel nuts back off.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I would like to think so too. I had the same thought process when I had Marvin Pitts mill/time all of my URX II's and III's so that they would index perfectly with the upper AND not rely solely on the barrel nut. Sadly, every time someone mentions this idea with the URX 4 no one can really step up and say "YES, that's true" or "NO, it's not".
In this thread and the linked thread, KAC is mentioned numerious times as being a top runner, but which one?... FF RAS? URX I-III? URX 4?
Bookmarks