Results 1 to 10 of 13

Thread: CA assault weapon reg

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Posts
    1
    Feedback Score
    0

    CA assault weapon reg

    They say in CA you have up until Jan 2018 to register a AR with the "features " is this true and/or is there any court case pending on weather or not this law is challenged?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Location
    Behind Enemy Lines
    Posts
    1,584
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    It's true. Starting 1 Jan, 2017, the state's decreed that pretty much every semi-auto rifle is an "assault weapon" and has to be registered or permanently modified so the magazine is no longer detachable (the "bullet button" is not an approved mod any more). Zero chance of a challenge to this any time soon. Starting in 2019, you won't be able to buy ammo in the state without a special license either.


    My advice is if you have any choice in the matter, stay away from CA.
    Last edited by sevenhelmet; 12-14-16 at 11:03.
    "We must, indeed, all hang together, or assuredly we shall all hang separately." -Benjamin Franklin

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    California
    Posts
    72
    Feedback Score
    5 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by sevenhelmet View Post
    Starting 1 Jan, 2017, the state's decreed that pretty much every semi-auto rifle is an "assault weapon" and has to be registered or permanently modified so the magazine is no longer detachable (the "bullet button" is not an approved mod any more).
    This is not true, and needs to be corrected before it unnecessarily scares off potential AR-15 buyers/owners in California (i.e. this post is old but still spreading FUD).

    Look, I know we all hate illogical gun laws, but if the state were banning all semi-automatic rifles with a detachable magazine, that would mean banning the M1A, the Mini-14, etc. California may be misguided, but these rifles remain legal, as this thread makes clear:
    https://www.m4carbine.net/showthread...ore-looks-like

    You can lawfully own an AR-15 in one of three ways in California:
    1. Keep all the "assault weapon" features + keep bullet-button magazine release + register
    2. Keep all the "assault weapon" features + install fixed magazine device (i.e. you must break open the action in order to reload)
    3. Get rid of all the "assault weapon" features (i.e. no flash hider, no pistol grip, no adjustable/folding stock) + keep regular magazine release

    We need more AR-15 enthusiasts in California to dispel myths, promote the platform, and educate our fellow Americans. Let's get it right!
    Last edited by butlers; 06-05-18 at 21:51.
    "The nation that will insist on drawing a broad line of demarcation between the fighting man and the thinking man is liable to find its fighting done by fools and its thinking done by cowards."
    William Francis Butler

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    23
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    First, those clowns in Sac introduced a bullet button thing few years ago, now they want us to register all stuff with stupid bullet button. Next - they are gonna confiscate it, I think, like in New York :-( . So, it was in Proposition 63 and 8 663 159 people voted for it
    Whole story here http://<br /> https://www.thetrace.o...bullet-button/
    Last edited by Alba9999; 12-14-16 at 14:01.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    163
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    California used to allow active duty military stationed in California, but residents of other states, to bring non-compliant rifles in if they registered them ($75). One of my friends was renewing the registration on his rifle (I believe it was annual) and received a response back that his request to re-register was denied, and he had 30 days to remove the rifle from the state. He sent it to his brother in a different state.

    I expect it to continue to deteriorate in California.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Posts
    31
    Feedback Score
    0
    It gets dumber. You were supposed to be able to register starting 1/1/16. But the Web address kept crashing per my FFL. Plus, the implementation regs are apparently going to try to require bullet buttons to stay on. Except the law does not say that. In fact, bullet buttons have been deemed inconsequential to status as an AW. So I have 3x builds in various states of assembly which I cannot finish, since I am not sure if they require bullet buttons. Retarded!

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    35
    Feedback Score
    0
    Anyone know what's the deal with semi auto shotguns like a Vepr or Saiga 12? anyway to make it featureless? I'm not seeing it.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Posts
    290
    Feedback Score
    0
    I still don't understand how free men tolerate being told what they can or can't own. Not very long ago, a lot of men died fighting a tyrant that tried to confiscate their arms. Food for thought.
    Colt > BCM

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    12,145
    Feedback Score
    43 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by militarymoron View Post
    Do you apply that understanding to NFA weapons/devices as well, or do you just have your buddy machine you a DIAS for your AR and laugh at all those poor SOBs who paid $20k for a fully transferable machine gun?
    Torched him!

    A+++

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    43
    Feedback Score
    5 (100%)
    Good luck to all California gun owners with Gavin Newsom as the governor. He openly declared that he will be even stricter than Jerry Brown with gun control especially after the Thousand Oaks shooting. Next up he will have 10/22’s labeled as an “assault rifle”...


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •