Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 24 of 24

Thread: .300 WSM as a precision caliber?

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Salem, OR/Anchorage AK
    Posts
    449
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)

    300 WSM Accuracy

    The 300 WSM is be used by more bullet manufacturers now to test the heavier bullets because of its inherit accuracy. From what I remember, Nosler is using 308 Win for 150 and below and 300 WSM for 165's on up. They are also using the 338 L for 338 batch testing over the 338 WM/RUM.

    The question is how far do you plan on shooting. Once the 308 Win goes subsonic 850-1000 (depending on barrel length) you might as well be throwing rocks. That is where the 30-06 and mags come into play.

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Southern California
    Posts
    4
    Feedback Score
    0
    I find the 300WSM a bit finicky to reload. Full length sizing and bumping back the shoulder one to two thou' each time is hard on the brass. But I suppose the web of the 300WM just above the belt will give you about the same amount of firings.

    I'm slinging 175 SMKs @ approx. 3040 fps from my WSM and in my 300WM, 190 SMK loaded to A191 specs.

    A ballistic program will tell you that these loads are pretty similar.

    Bill

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Greensboro, NC
    Posts
    145
    Feedback Score
    0
    Edited by YRAC. Not relevant to the original question about the performance of the .300 WSM in a precision rifle.
    Last edited by heijutsu; 10-24-08 at 11:11.
    4%'er

    “I'm the weapon, this is just a tool"
    -Michael Wilson

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    1
    Feedback Score
    0

    300 WSM Accuracy

    I'm using a Browning A-Bolt Stainless Stalker for hunting, and though I haven't gotten anything with that round it is fairly reliable for what I have to do.

    I've started with 165 grain Barnes TSXs and did OK for me after initial break in. I shifted around a little bit because those projoes are pricy. I can get 100 Hornady 165s for price of 50 Barnes or Nosler. Even shifting from the Nosler (which were slightly tighter than the Barnes) I'm able to put 4 shots within 1.00" at 100 yards, gun probably shoots a little better if I were more into bench equipment.

    I hear that 180 grain bullets might be better than the 165.

    I load the 165 SSTs over 64.4 grains of H414,CCI mag primers and Remington brass. RCBS equipment and then get a little of the lands. I hear that some rifles have different throat configurations so my length won't match anyone else.

    Again, I'm happy with 4 shots under an inch without trying too hard. If I get a solid rest and maybe some more tweaking and messin I might get even better. I do need to try IMR 4350 with the next loading cycle, especially if I go up to 180 grain pills.

    I think 165 through 200 grain bullets are in the sweet spot. The 200 might be too long for the normal barrel twist and compacted powder loads. 200 grainers put a lot of the bullet into the case's capacity. That might be acceptable with Berger or other VLD bullets.

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •