DECLAS all and let the chips fall where they will. And if it rips the skivvies of those meddling twatwaffles at MI6 who really DID try to interfere in our election, BONUS.
DECLAS all and let the chips fall where they will. And if it rips the skivvies of those meddling twatwaffles at MI6 who really DID try to interfere in our election, BONUS.
<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>Ye best start believin' in Orwellian Dystopias, mateys... yer LIVIN' in one!--after Capt. Hector Barbossa
Psalms 109:8, 43:1
LIFE MEMBER - NRA & SAF; FPC MEMBER Not employed or sponsored by any manufacturer, distributor or retailer.
<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>Ye best start believin' in Orwellian Dystopias, mateys... yer LIVIN' in one!--after Capt. Hector Barbossa
Psalms 109:8, 43:1
LIFE MEMBER - NRA & SAF; FPC MEMBER Not employed or sponsored by any manufacturer, distributor or retailer.
As Deshowitz has pointed out, the only witnesses that Meuller has are liars and cheats. How exactly do you build credible case on that? Of course, for the dems, they will take anything that they can get. Plus Dershowtiz sees that Meuller is going to blame all these liars on the lack of a credible collusion case. No one will tell him about collusions, so that prove that there is collusion.
Plus, Cohen is being indicted for lying to congress? Is that even a thing anymore???
One thing we know for sure is that it is always darkest right after the news breaks on Trump and Collusion. As soon as the story comes out, the problems and holes in it start to accumulate. How often has the the MSM and the Trump delusionists declared that it's over and this is it? Literaly 10-20 times.
The TRump Tower meetiing, except she met with Fusion before and after.
Cohen in Budapest- at least three times this has been a slam dunk.
Manafort-Assange: Until poeple realize that one meeting would be hard, three meetings is too much to believe.
Anything in the Dossier that is relevant to anything.
The Second Amendment ACKNOWLEDGES our right to own and bear arms that are in common use that can be used for lawful purposes. The arms can be restricted ONLY if subject to historical analogue from the founding era or is dangerous (unsafe) AND unusual.
It's that simple.
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/12/02/o...stigation.html
Ever notice that the worst it sounds for Trump is when you finish reading the headline? As you read the articles or listen to the report, the lies, spin, and lack of evidence all serve to mute the bold claims. It has been 2.5 years now of "THIS IS IT" and it ain't.
https://www.axios.com/mueller-invest...88ee216ef.html
It is interesting to read the other sides delusional attempts to keep this going.
Let's look at the "Russia, if you are listening, maybe you could find Hillary's missing emails". That the pundits on the left would take that seriously is laughable enough, that Mueller may be going into it as a real issue of collusion is quite crazy. They point to the fact that Russian trolls attacked HRC's email the next day! COLLUSION!!!! The emails were already trashed and gone, the comment by Trump was what everyone knows, Russia and probably China (among others) had gotten into HRC's emails before she deleted and literally went medieval on them with a hammer. At the time Trump made his comment, and action aferwards is really irrelevant. That anyone would take his comment as anything but trolling shows a serious lack of mental health.
Now Mueller is looking at it. It sounds crazy. I really have little faith in Mueller, but maybe he is chasing down every single crazy MSM fake news point to show that there is nothing there. If he doesn't address something, you know that the left will say AH-HAAAA that is the missing part that proves it all. I know that is giving too much credence to Mueller, but let's hope his inner angels win over the devilish forces arrayed against Trump.
ETA: The Russians do have the missing emails, just like they have everything off that ill-protected server. There probably isn't anything that stunning in there, just like Podesta's email was more embarrassing than illegal. They had done their part to smear HRC in the election, and they would have released the emails after she won as a way to weaken her.
Last edited by FromMyColdDeadHand; 12-03-18 at 12:04.
The Second Amendment ACKNOWLEDGES our right to own and bear arms that are in common use that can be used for lawful purposes. The arms can be restricted ONLY if subject to historical analogue from the founding era or is dangerous (unsafe) AND unusual.
It's that simple.
The Second Amendment ACKNOWLEDGES our right to own and bear arms that are in common use that can be used for lawful purposes. The arms can be restricted ONLY if subject to historical analogue from the founding era or is dangerous (unsafe) AND unusual.
It's that simple.
Patriotism means to stand by the country. It does not mean to stand by the President... - Theodore Roosevelt, Lincoln and Free Speech, Metropolitan Magazine, Volume 47, Number 6, May 1918.
Every Communist must grasp the truth. Political power grows out of the barrel of a gun. Our principle is that the Party commands the gun, and the gun must never be allowed to command the Party Mao Zedong, 6 November, 1938 - speech to the Communist Patry of China's sixth Central Committee
While at least one mainstream outlet is covering the latest bombshell, the news pages and aggregators seem to be conveniently ignoring criminal and ethics charges being levied against Team Mueller.
Left View:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...=.3b78ad940122
Right View:
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/con...alse-testimony
Details I saw on another website I don't have access to at the moment, actually had printouts of three emails Corsi sent Stone in 2016 as the basis for the Muller Team's assertion that Corsi committed perjury. Based on the fact that they seized his laptop, combed through it for who knows how long, and interviewed Corsi for over 40 hours in six separate sessions, then accused him of misleading investigators because he didn't remember three emails from 2016 (which they had and could've used to refresh his memory), it certainly seems like the classic FBI perjury trap. Corsi allegedly requested to correct his testimony after being threatened with perjury, which was refused. When I read the emails, there was absolutely no "smoking gun" in any of them. Just topics of discussion about potential future releases out of WikiLeaks, but no inside information or suggestions of direct contact with them from either Corsi or Stone.
I don't think any business professional is going to remember non-critical emails sent two years prior. I certainly couldn't tell you what I discussed with all my colleagues via email two years ago. That's why it pisses me off when the media cavalierly suggests that no one should be afraid to speak to the FBI if they're innocent and all they have to do is "tell the truth". No one except a person with an eidetic memory could withstand 40 hours of FBI interviews, where they've had time to scan ALL of your documents and communications, but aren't sharing those to refresh your memory.
I'm clean as clean can be, but I'd never agree to be interviewed by federal investigators, even with counsel present. Go make your case on someone else's back and if you think you can indict me then go for it! We'll go through discovery and once I know what you're working with, THEN my legal team with sit down with you. Until then? Go jump in a lake.
What if this whole crusade's a charade?
And behind it all there's a price to be paid
For the blood which we dine
Justified in the name of the holy and the divine…
I still don't know why people outside of govt talk directly to the FBI. FBI shows up, tell them to F off. I'll save my money for the defense. Hell, even immunity doesn't protect you because the immunity from a potential underlying crime doesn't protect you from these document traps. Compelled to testify? I don't remember, anything, or anything at all. Get Peter Gabriel to sing it for them.
The Second Amendment ACKNOWLEDGES our right to own and bear arms that are in common use that can be used for lawful purposes. The arms can be restricted ONLY if subject to historical analogue from the founding era or is dangerous (unsafe) AND unusual.
It's that simple.
Bookmarks