Ditto. I prefer a FFP scope, but it's not a necessity on a low power optic like the TR21. Like sgtmajor, as long as it's calibrated at one magnification, then I can do math from there.
Rich
Ditto. I prefer a FFP scope, but it's not a necessity on a low power optic like the TR21. Like sgtmajor, as long as it's calibrated at one magnification, then I can do math from there.
Rich
Has anyone attempted to put one on a PTR91? I've considered it but was told the length would not give me clearance for the charging handle.
The BDC works very well on the ACOG, and the reason the ACOG has a BDC is for speed.. I would think on a scope type optic it would be better just to learn to use your torrent and then get even more right on shots.. and if you really want a BDC best thing to do would be just buy a ACOG.. I love the idea and I would like to see a BDC on a Accupoint but there really is no need for one, since its really not a battle optic and its not made for speed.. I would like to see a Mil-line Accupoint tho.. that way it would not be set up for any certan round or grain.. all you would have to do is learn the mildots or mil-lines.. but I would rather just zero my rifle in for that range so I know I would be right on the bull.. like a 10 power accupoint with a mil-line type retical, would be really nice for long range shooting..
the biggest reason that i personally like the idea of the accupoint over the acog is that fact that its adjustable magnification being able to go from 1.25 to 4 is a greater asset to me. and as far as cranking the knobs goes it would have to have finger knobs like the leapold m3 or so before i would use it in that type of situation, i personally think the BDC would be better. the acog and the accupoint with BDC would serve about the same purpose for me but the adjustable magnification is a big deal i like that setup better than the acog with reddot combo
Bookmarks