Page 13 of 27 FirstFirst ... 3111213141523 ... LastLast
Results 121 to 130 of 263

Thread: BCM Prototype upper?

  1. #121
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Kansas
    Posts
    9,937
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Walker_Texasranger View Post
    I’ve read through a lot of this thread and I don’t get what this upper is. So what is it?
    The first thing you might notice is that the forward assist is moved forward - this especially helps lefties run the changing handle.

    The next thing is that they have beefed up the left forward side of the upper, nominally opposite the ejection port. This is reportedly to minimize the flex in the upper because of the ejection port.

    I'm not sure how much that flex actually impacts practical accuracy. I'm ssuthere are shooters and rifles that might benefit, I have enough MOA rifles that I don't see much utility in replacing existing receivers.

    Hopefully, once they get going with them, I'll be able to buy blems for new builds, and will happily do so.

    ETA: how does sure there turn into: ssuthere?
    Last edited by 26 Inf; 11-06-19 at 01:45.
    Patriotism means to stand by the country. It does not mean to stand by the President... - Theodore Roosevelt, Lincoln and Free Speech, Metropolitan Magazine, Volume 47, Number 6, May 1918.

    Every Communist must grasp the truth. Political power grows out of the barrel of a gun. Our principle is that the Party commands the gun, and the gun must never be allowed to command the Party Mao Zedong, 6 November, 1938 - speech to the Communist Patry of China's sixth Central Committee

  2. #122
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Eastern NC
    Posts
    8,732
    Feedback Score
    88 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by 26 Inf View Post
    The first thing you might notice is that the forward assist is moved forward - this especially helps lefties run the changing handle.

    The next thing is that they have beefed up the left forward side of the upper, nominally opposite the ejection port. This is reportedly to minimize the flex in the upper because of the ejection port.

    I'm not sure how much that flex actually impacts practical accuracy. I'm ssuthere are shooters and rifles that might benefit, I have enough MOA rifles that I don't see much utility in replacing existing receivers.

    Hopefully, once they get going with them, I'll be able to buy blems for new builds, and will happily do so.

    ETA: how does sure there turn into: ssuthere?
    Isn't the extra material supposed to also help in case of a kaboom too?
    Sic semper tyrannis.

  3. #123
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    2,420
    Feedback Score
    125 (100%)
    Theoretically, I believe a more rigid upper receiver should both enhance accuracy and extend bolt life to some degree. To what degree that is, all things being equal, I don’t know. Added protection in case of a kaboom would is a good thing. Moving the FA location forward some is probably also a good thing. I believe when they went to the flat top receivers they lost some of the rigidity they had with the intregal carry handle receivers. I doubt BCM would have went to all the trouble and expense, if these receivers didn’t provide significant enough benefits over the standard receivers.
    Last edited by Biggy; 11-06-19 at 13:00.

  4. #124
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Posts
    1,783
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Wake27 View Post
    Isn't the extra material supposed to also help in case of a kaboom too?
    If you really what to help in the case of an over pressure event, the best thing is to drill a hole somewhere to vent to pressure off, rather that attempt to contain it. And the hole should be somewhere the directs the gas away from the shooter.

  5. #125
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Mid-West, USA
    Posts
    2,825
    Feedback Score
    63 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by lysander View Post
    If you really what to help in the case of an over pressure event, the best thing is to drill a hole somewhere to vent to pressure off, rather that attempt to contain it. And the hole should be somewhere the directs the gas away from the shooter.
    The magazine well and ejection port, to a degree, act as such. Wouldn't a more rigid upper receiver help?

  6. #126
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Posts
    137
    Feedback Score
    0
    I believe the Vltor MUR is the best receiver currently in production, though they have some quirks. I seem to remember Iraqgunz had a kaboom and had nothing but praise for how well it contained everything.

    This looks like a nice improvement over traditional units, and would allow offset irons and the LMT ambi lower to function correctly while having a similar effect on rigidity. +1 for innovation. I plan to use one on an upcoming precision build.

  7. #127
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Mid-West, USA
    Posts
    2,825
    Feedback Score
    63 (100%)
    If they go slightly undersized on the barrel extension as on their BCM4 upper receivers, I can see myself becoming a bit more interested.

  8. #128
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    2,420
    Feedback Score
    125 (100%)
    [QUOTE=taekwondopreacher;2783807]If they go slightly undersized on the barrel extension as on their BCM4 upper receivers, I can see myself becoming a bit more interested.[/QUOTE

    I have absolutely no reason to think they won’t. I am in for three of them as soon as they are available.

  9. #129
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    VA
    Posts
    10,781
    Feedback Score
    17 (100%)
    They’re pretty nice I’m using one on my 2gun rifle.
    Chief Armorer for Elite Shooting Sports in Manassas VA
    Chief Armorer for Corp Arms (FFL 07-08/SOT 02)

  10. #130
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    1,871
    Feedback Score
    25 (100%)
    CC5F9085-2A98-4DE8-9A29-8136789003FF.jpgCC5F9085-2A98-4DE8-9A29-8136789003FF.jpg
    Quote Originally Posted by IKnowNotEverything View Post
    I believe the Vltor MUR is the best receiver currently in production, though they have some quirks. I seem to remember Iraqgunz had a kaboom and had nothing but praise for how well it contained everything.

    This looks like a nice improvement over traditional units, and would allow offset irons and the LMT ambi lower to function correctly while having a similar effect on rigidity. +1 for innovation. I plan to use one on an upcoming precision build.
    The pics of the forward assist I have seen one these pre production versions would not be compatible with LMT MARS-L or LWRC IC ambi lowers. The forward assist housing looks to interfere with the right side paddle.
    Last edited by jerrysimons; 11-07-19 at 01:22.

Page 13 of 27 FirstFirst ... 3111213141523 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •