Page 10 of 27 FirstFirst ... 8910111220 ... LastLast
Results 91 to 100 of 263

Thread: BCM Prototype upper?

  1. #91
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Location
    S FL
    Posts
    240
    Feedback Score
    12 (100%)
    Mark II upper? Is this a solution looking for a problem?

  2. #92
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Eastern NC
    Posts
    8,738
    Feedback Score
    88 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by MeanCarbine View Post
    Mark II upper? Is this a solution looking for a problem?
    Just because you’re not fixing a major flaw, does not mean something can’t be improved.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Sic semper tyrannis.

  3. #93
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    1,929
    Feedback Score
    45 (100%)
    I think it it all about what BCM is all about. They make battle rifles, and throughout history, the battle rifle has been chambered in .308 (7.62). I have no issue with my LMT weapons (5.56 & 7.62) except for what they weigh, but I thoroughly love them just as my BCM stuff. If anyone can make a .308 battle rifle that works well and doesn’t weigh a metric stit-ton, I know that BCM can and will.
    To educate a man in mind and not in morals is to educate a menace to society. --Theodore Roosevelt--

  4. #94
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    320
    Feedback Score
    8 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Wake27 View Post
    Just because you’re not fixing a major flaw, does not mean something can’t be improved.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Quote Originally Posted by MeanCarbine View Post
    Mark II upper? Is this a solution looking for a problem?


    I agree. The flat top AR upper flexes a lot vs the original design with an integral carry handle.

  5. #95
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    317
    Feedback Score
    0
    I agree with and understand the changes, except for keeping the forward assist.

  6. #96
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    3,742
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Artiz View Post
    I agree with and understand the changes, except for keeping the forward assist.
    There are a lot of reputable instructors who advocate for the forward assist following a press check, and the press check over dropping the mag to check which round is on top. I don’t think you really lose any customers by keeping it vs. who you lose without it.

  7. #97
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    317
    Feedback Score
    0
    Doesn't mean it should be there.

    Stoner and Sullivan were 100% against the forward assist being introduced and rightfully so. The bolt carrier was already designed with a forward assist, the divot on the side of the carrier in the ejection port.

    Military doctrine does not = small arms design/weapons mechanics.

  8. #98
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    4,383
    Feedback Score
    16 (100%)
    FA vs non-FA is like 9MM vs 45.

    The self-licking ice cream cone of arguments, even when both options are readily available for people to choose what they want.

    I'm an FA fan. I'm never going to think there is a round in the chamber until I see one, and loading slowly you can't guarantee the weapon is in battery.

    Old / long dead no longer speak and their opinions are frozen in time.

  9. #99
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Liberty, MO
    Posts
    844
    Feedback Score
    13 (100%)
    Another plus of the MUR...If you like your FA you can keep your FA. If not you have the option of case deflector only. If the price is right on the Mark two upper with a FA it is a great lower cost option against the MUR-1S/1A.

  10. #100
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Mid-West, USA
    Posts
    2,830
    Feedback Score
    63 (100%)
    Speaking of such, does anyone have an idea on the cost of the BCM Mark 2 upper receiver?

Page 10 of 27 FirstFirst ... 8910111220 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •