Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: torquing mount above barrel nut

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    77
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)

    torquing mount above barrel nut

    i bought a warne xskel mount for my pst gen1 1-4. per the instructions, i mounted it as far forward on the upper receiver as possible. the rifle shot ok with a few different brands and weights, but i will be using fiocchi 55gr mostly (the "better" ammo i had on hand only shot marginally better than the fiocchi at all distances). zeroed at 50 yards, about a 1" group. 100 yards averaged between 2.5-3. not too bad for a ddmk18 10.3" sbr. after i figured out my come up for 300, i was hitting the 8" plate damn near every time. when i was packing up to leave i realized my scope was loose. my dumb ass never torqued it down (65in/lb)! i figured it wouldn't take long to confirm so i went back to 50 to check the zero. everything seemed ok. when i went to 100, i was getting 4-5" groups with all the different ammo. so yes, the groups doubled in size with the proper torque setting vs hand tight. WTF??? so i backed the torque setting to 45in/lb. same 4-5" groups with all of the different ammo. so for shits and giggles, i torqued the mount to finger tight. i was back to 2.5-3" groups at 100 and smacking the 300yd 8" plate. i thought that maybe the dd upper just doesn't like the mount in general. the next day, i took my ddmk18 and my RRA 16" upper to see how that did and to get dope on the RRA upper as well. same F-ing thing. i torqued the RRA upper to 65 with the mount all of the way forward and was all over the place. so i tried hand tight, and i was getting .5" groups at 50, and 1.5-2" groups at 100. WTF?

    i ended up moving the mount back on both rifles about an 1" or so and torqued it to 65 to see if that would work and am able to get good groups, but now the rear of the scope is over the charging handle and the scope gets in the way.

    all shots were taken off an atlas bipod and rear bag. i'd rather run the scope mount all the way forward so i have room to reach the charging handle, but don't trust it to hold up during a 2 gun match.

    does anyone have any insight?

    223 ammo:
    fiocchi 55
    hornady american gunner 55
    hornady balck 62
    hornady match 75 bthp

    rifles:
    ddmk18 10.3" 1:9 twist 5.56 chamber
    rra 16" 1:7 twist 5.56 chamber
    Last edited by corey4; 01-29-18 at 11:52.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    4,653
    Feedback Score
    11 (92%)
    Dumb questions first... Is the mount 100% on the receiver? Are the cap screws in the rings torqued to Warne's 26 "# spec? If answers are yes and yes it could only be one of three things. There is something wrong with the scope or the ability of the shooter to consistently run the gun. 3rd... Tell me you are NOT mixing 5 different loads in the magazine because because they all perform about the same.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    901
    Feedback Score
    40 (100%)
    Assuming the mount it ONLY mounted on the receiver, it sounds as if it or the receiver is warped. I’ve never see either of those though. Torquing the mount could be tweaking the scope body, producing the MOA shift
    Last edited by hk_shootr; 01-29-18 at 13:17.
    Proper Planing Prevents Piss Poor Performance.......

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Location
    Alabama
    Posts
    799
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Regarding only the optic, you should use the values from Vortex. Here's what I learned from them: "Vortex Viper PST Torque Specs (Rings)
    Thought I'd pass this on to those who use torque specs when mounting scopes.

    ME: I recently ordered a Vortex Viper PST 1-4x24 and ADM Recon mount from OpticsPlanet. I had found conflicting values for the scope hold-down screws. I contacted ADM and they suggested 20-25 inch pounds. However, they told me that it's best to contact the scope manufacturer due to different housing thicknesses, etc. What do you recommend?

    Thank you

    Vortex Rep: Thank you for contacting Vortex Optics. Congratulations on your new Viper PST 1-4x24 scope! We recommend using 15-18 in/lbs for ring to scope. If you exceed this, you risk damaging the internal erector tube on your scope. Thank you for the inquiry! Thank you for choosing Vortex!!

    Complete thread: https://www.m4carbine.net/showthread...-Specs-(Rings)

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    77
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by GH41 View Post
    Dumb questions first... Is the mount 100% on the receiver? Are the cap screws in the rings torqued to Warne's 26 "# spec? If answers are yes and yes it could only be one of three things. There is something wrong with the scope or the ability of the shooter to consistently run the gun. 3rd... Tell me you are NOT mixing 5 different loads in the magazine because because they all perform about the same.
    come on...give me some credit lol. i am not using all of the different ammo in the same mag on the same group. it's not my inability to run the gun either. i'm not the best shooter, but i'm a fairly competent shooter. below in an 8" circle, 7 out of 8 (i forgot to dial on the first shot...oops. a buddy was "spotting" for me and when i shot the first round he said i was way low.). the head on the silhouette is 6", 7 for 7. not super impressive, but capable. yes i know the group is a little low. it was part of getting my dope. i was aiming at the center of the "body". both of these groups were shot with the mount finger tight. both are 300 yds. both were shot with my sbr and fiocchi. i'm not one to really run around and take pics of groups and post them, but there is a fudd at work who thinks it's impossible to hit a plate at 300yds with an sbr, so that's why i took the pics.

    KIMG1133.jpg

    KIMG1134.jpg

    Quote Originally Posted by hk_shootr View Post
    Assuming the mount it ONLY mounted on the receiver, it sounds as if it or the receiver is warped. I’ve never see either of those though. Torquing the mount could be tweaking the scope body, producing the MOA shift
    it is only mounted on the receiver, not the rail. it can't be the mount is warpped, because i have the mount sitting with the first screw 4 rail sections back from the front of the receiver. i had it mounted fully forward, shot a "group", moved it back one rail section at a time until i got normal groups again. this was done with both uppers.

    Quote Originally Posted by bamashooter View Post
    Regarding only the optic, you should use the values from Vortex. Here's what I learned from them: "Vortex Viper PST Torque Specs (Rings)
    Thought I'd pass this on to those who use torque specs when mounting scopes.

    ME: I recently ordered a Vortex Viper PST 1-4x24 and ADM Recon mount from OpticsPlanet. I had found conflicting values for the scope hold-down screws. I contacted ADM and they suggested 20-25 inch pounds. However, they told me that it's best to contact the scope manufacturer due to different housing thicknesses, etc. What do you recommend?

    Thank you

    Vortex Rep: Thank you for contacting Vortex Optics. Congratulations on your new Viper PST 1-4x24 scope! We recommend using 15-18 in/lbs for ring to scope. If you exceed this, you risk damaging the internal erector tube on your scope. Thank you for the inquiry! Thank you for choosing Vortex!!

    Complete thread: https://www.m4carbine.net/showthread...-Specs-(Rings)
    i torque all of my vortex scopes to 20 on my fat wrench. i have a few pst gen1s, a pst gen2, a few razor gen2s (all are the bigger bolt gun scopes). this is my first and only little scope.
    Last edited by corey4; 01-30-18 at 06:10.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •