I would not be interested in an APC9 with or without Glock mags.
I would be VERY interested in an MP9 with Glock mags. VERY.
TED
I would not be interested in an APC9 with or without Glock mags.
I would be VERY interested in an MP9 with Glock mags. VERY.
TED
I want an APC 9 that uses the most reliable magazine platform. If B&T’s mags are the way to go, I will stick with that.
I am waiting for the APC9 patrol model that has the longer barrel and handguard. The “pro” variant sounds great. Only reason I don’t want the SD version is I can’t run the gun suppressed for steel and PCC matches
For an inexpensive subgun, I can see inexpensive magazines being a consideration. If someone I going to buy a B&T subgun, I don't think inexpensive magazines would make much of a difference. Handgun and subgun compatibility might be a consideration, but knowing that the original design magazines run 100% would be more important to me.
Before you suggest that licensing, background checks, or other restrictions for the 2nd Amendment are reasonable... Apply those same ideas to the 1st and 4th Amendments. Then tell me how reasonable they are.
I was interested in the Glock mag compatible lower for regulatory reasons because I anticipate a restricted magazine capacity ban in the near future for people in Illinois. Glock 10 round magazines would solve the problem.
I recently saw B&T starting making 10 round magazines for overseas markets, but they have yet to import any to the States. I emailed Jeremy at B&T about getting some, but he hasn't gotten back to me to say if it's a possibility.
If Grant has any pull with them, I'd sure appreciate getting a handful of them.
If I want to bring the APC out to play at my club and there's a ban on standard capacity mags I'll be forced to use the approved size. I don't make the rules, and dead people in Chicago elect the rule makers. I'm stuck here until I retire so I have to go along with their nonsense publicly.
Bookmarks